alexsarll: (Default)
I haven't been up to a huge amount lately; judging by today's sun the time of hibernation may be ending, but there's been a lot more reading and DVDs than antics. Spot of furniture construction for [livejournal.com profile] xandratheblue (sometimes I wonder if I may have overdone the John Steed-style 'pose as feckless incompetent' bit, people do get very surprised when I'm practical), comedy then pub on Sunday (Michael Legge especially good as the bewildered MC, Steve Hall from Klang talking more about his swimsuit area than I might have wished, but still excellent). I've watched a lot of films, but more on them later in the week, I think. Two series finished and one promising new show started, so let's keep this one televisual.

My hopes for BBC One's new space colonisation drama Outcasts were not high; I'd heard bad things about how the makers didn't like it being considered science fiction, and as a rule that just means someone is making very bad science fiction. Imagine my surprise when it turns out to be the hardest SF I've seen on TV...possibly ever. And that's hard in both senses; the set-up is not that far off Firefly, but this is a lot less jaunty and swashbuckling. This is about the hard slog of the early days, the muttered references to how bad things were on Earth, the realisation that humanity is down to a few thousand people and even they can't live peacefully together. A good cast - Liam Cunningham, Hermione Norris, Keats from Ashes to Ashes and Apollo from BSG - but not all of them make it to the end of the episode. I like it when shows kill off major characters unexpectedly, it helps to maintain the sense of jeopardy.

Primeval used to be good at that too. This series, not so much, even though the protagonists have suddenly developed a quite uncanny ability to go on missions without adequate back-up, then drop their guns. Since ITV attempted to cancel their one good programme - for showing up everything else they produce, I assumed - it has got visibly cheaper, not in terms of the monster CGI (still great) but in terms of what seems a hurriedness to the writing, and a weird emptiness of the sets. They've saved a ton on extras, but ended up with something that feels a bit too much like Bugs, if anyone remembers that. But if nothing else, it's the only TV drama I've spotted which has any interest in demonstrating the evils of PFI.

But for really getting through the main cast, since Oz ended there has been nothing to equal Spartacus: Blood and Sand. I'm not surprised they're following it up with a prequel, because there really aren't many characters left to follow into the future except Spartacus himself, and Andy Whitfield is too ill to resume that role, poor bastard. And of course prequels have their own problems, because you know who's going to make it. So this may turn out to have been essentially a one-off - but what a one-off. Looking back, even in the earlier, sillier episodes the big theme was there, and that theme was the real trickledown effect. Not the happy, fluffy right-wing fantasy where we all get rich off the very rich's spending - the real version, where the moment's whim of someone higher up than you can up-end (or simply end) your whole life. Again and again, person A suffers simply because B has just had a row with C. And especially when B literally owns A, that can be fatal. Even when they don't, a catastrophic cascade can still result - but the indignities and worse, the difficulty of love or friendship, of being unfree are powerfully drawn. And where the corny old film of Spartacus used this haunting horror of slavery to praise the American Dream, to show how much better things are nowadays, the TV show is made in darker, wiser times. It knows that, unless there happen to be a couple of oligarchs watching, the audience are slaves too.
alexsarll: (Default)
Just when the prequel webisodes and the first half of the series opener had me worried that the new series of Primeval was a bit straightforward compared to the inspired lunacy of last series, that skating so close to cancellation had them scared - they had the character played by Hannah from S Club distract a totally enormous and temporarily non-extinct dinosaur by playing 'Don't Stop Moving' really loudly at it. Excellent. But it still feels very odd that the only exciting original programming on TV all week is two hours on ITV1.

So, New Year's Eve. I've not been to anything but a house party since the Islington Bar glory days of Stay Beautiful, or to anything which required public transport for nearly as long, and I think maybe I had the right idea. I like Bevan 17, I like the No Fiction resident DJs, I even liked the odd singer-songwriter/accordionist/beatboxer opening act who seemed even more out of place than I was as they did a surprisingly good cover of 'So Long, Marianne'. But the crappy 8 bit duo in between who spent 15 minutes fiddling about as though it was going to make them sound any less piss-poor, and the Whip's DJ set of headache electro, and the boozed-up populace of Kilburn who just wanted somewhere to get lairy, and the hordes of mad-eyed partyers on the Tube of whom half seem only to go out on this one night...no thanks. I'm still not sure if I was actually ill or just in some form of existential shock, but having only had two pints while out, by 2am I was in bed, and on New Year's Day I felt considerably worse than if I'd been overdoing it round a friend's house the night before as per usual. But I do like the way the unusual shape of the weeks this time round has stretched out the holiday season - it has less of a direct effect on me than on a lot of people, but the sense of a proper extended break, almost of carnival, is contagious.

Mark Gatiss' history of horror reminded me that years back, m'learned colleague [livejournal.com profile] dr_shatterhand had recommended I watch seventies Brit horror The Blood on Satan's Claw. Gatiss brackets it alongside Witchfinder General and The Wicker Man as 'folk horror', and I'd agree with the first half of that; as far as I'm concerned The Wicker Man isn't horror at all, but an Ealing comedy by another name. This, though...this is definitely horror. Sometime in the early 18th century*, somewhere in the English countryside, a demonic relic is unearthed and the village children's games turn sinister. Very gradually, at first, yet it's still terribly sinister, and I love that - it reminds me of Arthur Machen's 'The White People', or the final Quatermass, or Robert Holdstock's Lavondyss from before his Mythago books got dull, when they still captured all the strangeness and terror of myth. What could have been a Merrie Englande fiasco is instead just grotty enough and grey enough to feel like the real countryside on its off days, as the diabolic forces bubble up from beneath.
(Added points of interest for Doctor Who fans: sh1t eighties Master Anthony Ainley plays the vicar, and sixties companion Zoe aka Wendy Padbury is the centrepiece of a ritual gang rape scene which, alarmingly, was apparently pretty much improvised on the spot)

*The blurb says the 17th, but a Jacobite character toasts James III, so no.

Geek/Gay

Oct. 6th, 2009 01:59 pm
alexsarll: (seal)
Contrary to earlier reports, Primeval is coming back for another two series. Great news for everyone except ITV - it's a real nail in the coffin for their mad dash towards utter worthlessness as a channel.

"Two "offensive" number plates have been withdrawn from a Worcestershire auction. The plates F4 GOT and D1 KES"...would clearly never have been bought by a straight, only by a faggot or a dyke reclaiming the term. Over-sensitive idiocy.

Read Jeph Loeb's Ultimates 3 last night, expecting a comic at least as staggeringly bad as his Hulk, and was disappointed to find that it was merely mediocre. The plot makes no sense, the misogynist overtones are depressing, the pacing's shot, the art is clunky and the resolution's unsatisfactory - but you could say all of those things twice over about the original Stan Lee/Jack Kirby run on the originals of these characters in The Avengers.

As already seems to be the common view, I prefer the DW TARDIS to the full DOCTOR WHO in the new Who logo. But then, I like all of it more than the last logo, or the McCoy era one, and those prefaced some of my favourite stories in the series' 46 years. And some stinkers too, of course, but it was ever thus - this was never a show anyone loved for consistency. For instance: I just listened to Time Works, which made me revise my opinion of Steve Lyons; I'd always thought of him as a pretty poor writer of Who books, but it turns out he's also a poor writer of Who audios. He's in love with weird fairytale ideas - the Land of Fiction, the Doctor landing on a cartoon planet, or clockwork men who move between the tick and the tock. But he forgets that for every time the series carried something like that off in a 'Blink' or a Kinda, there were messes like Warrior's Gate or the end of Trial of a Time Lord. Hell, even the original Mind Robber was of questionable merits, a few fine images aside. And yet, still, among the tedium and confusion he brings out the one great exchange which means I don't regret the time spent with this:
Villain: You! Do you realise what you've done?
The Doctor: "I've brought down an oppressive regime in a little over two and a half hours. Not my best time, admittedly.
alexsarll: (crest)
So it's precisely 105 years since the day on which it's set, and I've just finished Ulysses. Which in places is precisely as obscene and as incomprehensible and as up its own (and other) arses as the haters ever claimed - a particularly trying section for me being 'Sirens', which felt like trying to read a ringtone. But which is also so rich and so full and so alive. Whenever people bug me to write a novel, I tell them that I've only ever had two ideas for one, and I got beaten to them both. One was about a city in a state of existential collapse, citizens caught in the fall-out from a war they couldn't even comprehend - and just as I was starting to work out how that might play, three other people produced it (two of them called Jeff, which left me suspicious of Jeffs for a while). All very good, though, so if anything it just saved me some trouble. The other didn't even have a plot, so much as a style - the idea of a story which was perfectly in every moment, protean, shifting its form to follow the defining mood of each incident. Well, it turns out James Joyce beat me to it 55 years before I was even born, even if he left out the full-on action adventure chapter I think might have made it even more complete. I suppose in expressing the infinite richness of a single day, Ulysses might have inspired my favourite album ever, The Divine Comedy's Promenade, and that was always going to incline me in its favour. But still I thank heavens that I read it for pleasure rather than studying it. With something like this, or Gravity's Rainbow, I have to get into the flow of the prose, let it wash over me, appreciate it like music rather than trying to make sure I have the full measure of each individual word. If I'd run into it during my degree, I'd have managed maybe two chapters of notes, quit and bluffed, like I did with Henry James (to whom I've never returned). And I was going to say now that this was the last book I felt any obligation to read, that now I'm truly free...except I just caught sight of that copy of Don Quixote on the shelf. Not just yet, though, eh?
(I forget - has League of Extraordinary Gentlemen referenced Ulysses yet? If not, the obvious point of contact would be M'Intosh. We never do find out who he is, so I think maybe Quartermain)

Of course, because I had to finish this on Bloomsday, and didn't really want to get underway on any other big reads in the meantime, I was rather kicking around for shorter stuff to read these last few days, having got to the end of the penultimate chapter on Friday. So I very nearly finished Saturday's paper on Saturday, and have been getting through a lot of short stories, and yesterday I went to the park to read about two outsiders who rose to lead great empires - Benjamin Disraeli and Conan. Somehow I don't think those points in common would have seen them become great friends, though. Anyway, there was some canine event in the park, but I didn't notice any more dogs than usual - just bigger dogs. At least three which were bigger than most people I know, each of a different breed and each with a different owner. Also, I noticed grave goods. I'm used to floral tributes and pictures when someone has died young, but on a tree in the park it was instead a birthday of the deceased being marked, and as well as photos, notes and flowers, the friends had left vodka and Red Bull.

Primeval cancelled; should have known ITV wouldn't want to spoil their record by continuing to produce a decent show. You can't leave Danny Quinn stuck at the dawn of man, you sods!
alexsarll: (seal)
Well that...that was unexpected. Having heard earlier in the day that a third series of Ashes to Ashes was confirmed, I was expecting a cop-out ending to the second series last night, and fearing that the third was going to be marking time with formulaic episodes like so much of the second series of Life on Mars. spoilers )
The ending of Primeval, on the other hand, was horribly hit by pacing. I'm used to this in comics, where delays can turn an undemanding but fun adventure series into an interminable so-what? And while I like the bonkersness of what Primeval has become, it couldn't sustain me over a two week. Still, I suppose on the intervening week ITV1 were showing the big footballist thing and Susan Boyle; another programme with subhuman apemen and hideous monsters might have been overkill.
(Speaking of monsters, here's me as a minotaur)
So those two being done would leave me pretty much without anything to watch on TV bar South Pacific (I can haz middle age?), except that on Thursday Mitchell and Webb are back, preceded by the potentially promising fantasy spoof Krod Mandoon and the Flaming Sword of Fire. Followed next week by League of Gentlemen successor Psychoville. Still, looks like I might be getting my drama digitally for a while.

On Friday, [livejournal.com profile] renegadechic showed me a Youtube clip which has been stuck in my head ever since and keeps randomly giving me the giggles when I remember bits of it: 'Total Eclipse of the Heart' with the lyrics amended to describe the video. Sacrilegious but brilliant.
alexsarll: (pangolin)
I've only mentioned Primeval once this series, early on, when I worried that the changes to the format meant it was losing its charm. But over the past few weeks it's become increasingly clear that I should post again to say - I was wrong. I have no idea how long they can keep this up, but the past few episodes have shown a delightful determination to leave no stone of bonkersness unturned. They've not totally ditched the format - each week is still likely to feature a dinosaur or similar turning up through a hole in time or 'anomaly', rampaging around outer London eating stuff, and then being foiled by Our Heroes. But oh, such flexibility they've found in that format. The team has been shaken up - not least by having one of the main characters unexpectedly killed, in a mid-series episode where you're initially certain that there will be a way out of that - and there isn't. Jason Flemyng is not a great actor by any means, but he has the right sort of puppyish enthusiasm for a role where you get to eg bait dinosaurs with helicopters.
Two weeks ago, the plot formulated a situation whereby it made sense for Our Heroes to be running around some woods, unarmed, being chased by prehistoric killer ostriches against whom the only defence was dodging through a minefield. Last week, we got a double anomaly: a dinosaur turns up in the Middle Ages, and then the dinosaur and the knight who has of course taken it for a dragon end up in a modern wrecker's yard, which the knight not unreasonably decides is Hell. And that was all before the first ad break, it got stranger after that. Tomorrow, it looks like we're headed off to the post-apocalyptic future to which anomalies open up whenever they need a creature so outlandish that even the vast bestiaries of the past cannot supply it. And while I've never used ITV's iPlayer equivalent, it seems to have four episodes of Primeval available at a time. Give one a try.
alexsarll: (bill)
Monday night at the Salisbury: I am the first member of my quiz team to arrive. At the bar is a top financial pundit of my acquaintance, in the same position. We spot two adjacent tables and grab both, sat on the bench, chatting. I realise this is slightly irregular, but what comes next is still a shuddering breach of all canons of boozer behaviour. Three peons* turn up, and attempt to sidle into the end of one of the tables.
Us:"Sorry, we've each got a team coming for the quiz, we're going to need both tables."
(True: we ended up with 14 people between the two)
Peons: "This is our table, we just went out for ten minutes for a fag."
(Untrue: I had been there at least ten minutes by this point, m'learned colleage for 15)
Us: "Well, you can't just all wander off, then come back and reclaim your table."
Peons: "I beg to differ, but hey, I don't want to get in a fight about it."
Exeunt peons, muttering.
Now come on, that's not how pubs work, is it? Later I was briefly left minding both tables, while one lot were smoking and another buying drinks. But I was there, and so were various tokens of table taken-ness: drinks, books, coats. On Friday, after accidentally walking out of London, when I decided that I needed some food as well as a pint, I did leave my table unattended to order - but that was in a beer garden with spare tables a-plenty, and I left my 2/3-full pint *and* my book on the table, just to be clear.

Also annoying me on Monday: plot holes. Primeval merely required some of its characters to be uncommonly stupid (why did Dr Ethnic not think to ask who Helen was, or mention the woman she'd bumped into in the street after her pass turned out to have been stolen by a dead man? Why did nobody else think to show Dr Ethnic a picture of their arch-enemy as part of her induction briefing?), and tried to get too many genres into one show - on top of the usual dinosaur time-travel malarkey, 45 minutes gives you time to do either a story in the style of an MR James haunted house yarn, or the one with Jason Flemyng as an acknowledged tough cop cliche, but not both. But James Blish's third Cities in Flight book, Earthman, Come Home...well, the other three are all circa 130 pages long, and this is 230, and the length doesn't suit it, and it shows. The first one's a prequel, following a couple of strands through the stagnating Earth of fairly soon and showing us how in spite of that, humanity gets into space. The second is a bildungsroman, one Shanghaied spacer finding his way around the world of the stars in the manner of an early Heinlein. This one...it has more scope, more daring, more sense of what life is like in Blish's stars. It has prescient things to say about depressions in hi-tech societies, and a communication method which looks suspiciously like Twitter. The dubious gender politics, and the heteronormativity, I can forgive. Even the explanation of why pirates died out on Earth, asinine as it looks in the face of Somalia and the South China Sea, I can overlook. But the basic principle of these stories is that Earth's cities have become spacefaring itinerant labourers, trading on their inhabitants' technical know-how, with each city propelled through space by a Macguffin called a 'spindizzy'. Whose principles are so simple that even after Earth's government tried to suppress it, it was independently rediscovered by accident.
These endlessly resourceful space-faring technologists, who can take a whole planet for a joyride, can't manage more than a short-term jury-rigged repair on their own engines/life-support/way of life.
Now, if that were intended as a comment on the world of now, where we all rely on devices so far beyond our practical repair capabilities as practically to invoke Clarke's Law, then fair enough. But if so, no hint of that whatsoever. It's just a mechanism to get the protagonists to where the story needs them, and it will not do.

I always loved Charlotte Bronte's comment that "Miss [Jane] Austen being, as you say, without "sentiment", without poetry, maybe is sensible (more real than true), but she cannot be great.'' But I was still gladdened to discover yet another writer far better than Austen demonstrating similar wisdom: '"What is all this about Jane Austen?" demanded a baffled Joseph Conrad, writing to HG Wells. "What is there in her?"' If Wells did respond with anything more than a shrug, I think I'd rather not know about it.

Finsbury Parkers - or at least those of you on the Islington side of the street - apparently our MP is an associate of Holocaust-deniers. Fun.

*Just so we're all clear here - one of them's a white rasta.
alexsarll: (magneto)
I've not been to a zoo since I was a tiny, and dimly remember them as a bit of a dispiriting experience. But having finally visited London Zoo, the vast majority of the animals there seemed reassuringly happy, or at worst indolent rather than stressed; animals from the park next door were also showing a vote of confidence, with their heron coming to hang out with the zoo's penguins (whose most prolific egg-layer is called Stuart), and pigeons sat in the okapis' feed trough. They also have what could easily feel like an excessive amount of monkeys, if monkeys weren't so awesome (especially the tamarin which made an escape effort it hadn't really thought through). Plus butterflies! Burrowing owls! And an ibis, which I recognised because it had the same shaped-head as Thoth. Much the same sort of set-up as they used in the new series of Primeval, in fact, except that here the animal-looking-like-an-Egyptian-god thing seemed to be a bit more of an effort to re-angle the series towards dinosaurs-as-source-of-myths - presumably a focus group told them that they needed a bit of mysticism in with the (pseudo)science. It's a shame, they seem to be retooling too many things at once and not really getting any of them right yet; the chemistry's off with Steven gone, the new young male lead is astonishingly blank, and Cutter's new hair is just wrong. I fear the Curse of ITV could have claimed their last decent terrestrial show.
(Not entirely convinced by the Skins finale either. Super Hans as a parent? Dear heavens)

In top North London news, "Much-missed Islington venue The Garage is to be re-opened after a not inconsiderable refurb in June this year, as part of MAMA Group and HMV's previously reported joint venture, which is operating under the Mean Fiddler name in corporate terms, but which brings the HMV brand into the live space as far as the sign above the door is concerned." Let's hope it won't have lost all its old charm in the branding frenzy - that used to be one of my favourite venues. Or two if you count Upstairs.

Oh, and anyone who's somehow managed not to watch The Wire yet and wants to see what all the fuss is about - it starts on BBC2 tonight. I thought that the model of pay TV shows turning up on terrestrial a bit later was dead in the age of the DVD box set, but apparently not; there's an episode per week-night for the next three months.
alexsarll: (manny)
There seems to have been a certain amount of point-missing as regards the excellent first episode of Ashes to Ashes. Even the estimable [livejournal.com profile] freakytigger seems to take at face value Alex Drake's assumption that it's all happening in her own comatose brain - but if she's just creating this from her own reading of Sam Tyler's file, then she wouldn't know - as we do, as Ray tells her - that Sam went back. All the evidence suggests that Gene Hunt's world is real (for a given value of the word) and persistent. And as for the fears that it will be impossible to follow through the potential weirdness of the story on a prime time, mainstream show - bear in mind that the moral of the final Life on Mars was it is better to commit suicide than live in the modern world. I had feared a lame retread with more sexual tension; instead, they seem to be making exactly the sequel they needed to make if it was to be any more than a mere franchise-stretcher. And, one which gives them a perfect excuse to go crazily OTT because we no longer need to even slightly believe this might be the 'real' version of the past era rather than some kind of policeman's Valhalla in period dress.

Elsewhere on the Beeb, Torchwood seems to be settling in to good episode/bad episode alternation this series. After an excellent episode about From Hell-style ghosts and timeslips, whose opening made me take it for the PJ Hammond contribution (who knew Helen Raynor had this in her after the New York Dalek atrocity and 'Ghost Machine', the episode so bad it almost made me drop Torchwood?), we get 'Meat'. There's a good idea at the heart of it, but it's just used as the kernel for a big frothy mass of human interest. Here's the problem with 'human interest': humans aren't very interesting. People who don't get that can sod off and watch the soaps. The Doctor is more interesting than his companions. Jack Harkness is more interesting than Gwen. But Hell, even Gwen is more interesting than her boring bloody fiance. I refuse even to use the character's name, he doesn't deserve it - but the one decent storyline to do with him was the one where Bilis Manger killed him. Now, if someone else could do the job - and properly this time - I'd be much obliged. Or Bilis could do it himself; I thought they'd maybe blown a good recurring villain too soon at the first season's end, but one of the new books, The Twilight Streets, brings him back and makes clear that he's still a viable proposition. It's a pretty good book in general; bit slashy in places, and the ending makes no sense, but even then I suspect it's the sort of nonsense which would pass fine were it being shouted on screen, rather than down on the page in black and white. And it has lots of pleasingly, infuriatingly enigmatic hints about past teams, about Archie in Glasgow and Torchwood Four, and about Jack's mysterious past (and future?). And yes, OK, it has some mentions of Gwen's idiot fiance, but he's never allowed to unbalance the story into tedious domesticity. Hell, even ITV's answer to Torchwood, the now rather patchy Primeval, gets this bit right - whenever they have a love story it gets 'Sound of Thunder'd out of the timeline, or the outsider who supposedly fancies one of the team turns out to be an evil spy, and then we get back to a very wet Hannah S Club kicking a mutant seal's face off.
While we're around the Doctor Who universe - I've often wondered if I'm being unfair when I unfavourably compare respectable literary authors to the better Who writers, particularly Lance Parkin. After all, it's not like-for-like; Parkin has an advantage just from the subject matter. Well, the Guardian helpfully published a story by the award-winning AL Kennedy whose emotional core is some stuff about Doctor Who. So now I can compare fairly, and confirm that the feted Kennedy would make a passable third-tier Doctor Who writer.
alexsarll: (death bears)
I used to respect Tom Hodgkinson; once the Idler was the best magazine going, and How To Be Idle remains (for the most part) a valuable work of political philosophy mis-filed as humour. Alas, of late he has become one of the tinfoil hat brigade, retailing tired cliches about mobile 'phones as enslavers and the like. And he really doesn't like Facebook. Shockingly, a major company has shareholders who are a bit right-wing! Not homophobes or religious nuts like run half the public transport in Britain, mind - but a utopian who's all in favour of life-extension and the Singularity. Which is a bad thing, apparently. No, don't ask me how. Oh, and apparently it's really, like Big Brother, man! that Facebook's privacy policy says "You understand and acknowledge that, even after removal, copies of user content may remain viewable in cached and archived pages or if other users have copied or stored your user content." Because obviously if Facebook kept a record of anyone who'd ctrlC'd any of your content, and deleted that when you deleted the original, that would be in no way Big Brother-esque, would it?
Tosser.

ITV are really going for the big push, aren't they? OK, so their best show, Entourage, shows no sign of returning from its baffling mid-season hiatus, but that's an import. Their best home-grown, and the best thing they have on terrestrial, is Primeval, which restarted on Saturday. Kingdom is probably the weakest Stephen Fry offering in some time, but it's still Stephen Fry and thus better than almost anything on ITV; that came back Sunday. Royal dramedy The Palace looks like it might be half-decent, but it's scheduled opposite City of Vice (Henry Fielding fights crime - WITH WIGS!), so I shall probably never know. Oh, and there was Moving Wallpaper, wasn't there? That should have been good. I loved the idea of making a new soap, and then having a sitcom set behind the scenes of the soap, even before I knew Ben Miller was starring in it. They've also got a couple of Absolute Power alumni, and therein lies their problem - media in-jokes only appeal to a niche audience, and Absolute Power does them much better, even in the episodes written by Smug Slug*. The show has been infected with that terrible ITVitis (the disease which atrophies human acting and scripting ability even in the gifted). On top of which, they've absolutely blown it by showing Moving Wallpaper right before the soap whose production it shows/undermines, on the same channel. Echo Beach belongs on ITV1, channel of choice for the undiscriminating cudlip. The sly dig at it should not be interfering with their evening of cathode ray grazing - it should be tucked away on ITV2. Same slot, so people who want the pair reflecting on each other can still have the experience - but you should have to work for it, if only in the sense of changing channel.
Not that ITV are the only people launching inept sitcoms, of course. Consider Never Better on C4, with Guy from Green Wing once again playing a less amusing variation on the same character. But for heavens' sake don't consider it for very long, life is short and there is so much better stuff you could be watching. Or indeed, appearing in; his Green Wing brother Martin has been openly retconned into Primeval, which somehow evades ITVitis and continues to kick arse. Motorbike chases with velociraptors in a shopping centre? 'Sound of Thunder' time travel messes used to mess with the lead's head *and* sex up the set-up? Hannah S Club with a gun? I'm sold.

Have been listening to A Cellarful of Motown volume 3 a fair bit lately. It's volume 3 of a label rarities compilation and it doesn't have a single dud on it; how many labels can say that, and how many volumes would it take Motown before they started scraping the barrel? Which is not to say I love them all equally - 'Uptight' aside I never really got Stevie Wonder, and Carolyn Crawford's 'Too Young Too Long' is a bit reminiscent of the song at the end of Brass Eye's Paedogeddon - but not one track sucks. I find myself especially drawn to 'Loving You (Is Hurting Me)' but that may just be because it's credited to the Fantastic Four, so I picture it soundtracking another of those painful Reed/Sue/Namor love triangle scenes.

An interesting if grouchy piece on Marvel and DC notes that both companies, as corporate entities, place a vanishingly small amount of their emphasis on the ongoing publication of comics (against which, part of me is thrilled to see DC describe itself as the home of "such popular characters as Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman and The Sandman". Gaiman's boy in with the Trinity already...). And the scorn directed at the concept of an Ant-Man film is definitely misplaced when you recall that Edgar Wright has been named in connection with the project. But this ties in with something I was thinking about before christmas, except I see it as cause for rejoicing if only the message could be filtered up the line. To wit:
It doesn't matter what happens in the comics.
Corporate superhero properties have, as a rule, been reined in by a fear of hurting the brand. The theory goes that if little Tommy sees the new Batman film, and he then picks up a Batman comic at the drugstore/newsagent, it should to some degree tally with what he saw on screen. So Batman has to be Bruce Wayne (this has already nixed one of Grant Morrison's rumoured plans for the forthcoming Final Crisis).
Except drugstores and newsagents don't carry comics anymore, or if they do it's one of the reprint titles with 'classic' material. So it doesn't matter what's happening in the comics in the comic shops. Because if little Tommy goes in there, the retailer would be a mug to sell him the latest issue of the monthly. Give him one of the trades of the classics. If he says 'goddamn' a lot, give him All-Star Batman. If he's blatantly a goth, Arkham Asylum. I'm hard-pressed to think exactly what sort of little Tommy you'd need to think that giving him the monthly would be a remotely wise idea. So in the monthly, just let Grant Morrison do whatever the Hell the little voices are telling him, and everyone's happy!

Live Free Or Die Hard (fvck the UK title) is basically the same plot as Die Hard With A Vengeance + The Interweb, isn't it? Not that I'm complaining. And Die Harder is a great film overall, but definitely has the least compelling villain.

*He tries to pass for human by the name 'Mark Lawson', but does it really fool anyone?
alexsarll: (merlot)
Kentish Town was in a gig frenzy last night, but as it turned out most of them were there for The Shins at the Forum rather than the first (only?) show by 'The Exhibitionists'. Not that the latter were exactly short of fans themselves - one could almost believe them to be an established band playing under an assumed name or something! Almost all new material at this show, obviously - some of it more rocking and some of it funkier than one might expect if one had any clear expectations, which of course one can't what with them being a new band and all*. It's hard to have any precision when judging this much newness all in one gulp, but I'm pretty certain the signs are good.

Russell T Davies on Primeval: "Its (lack of) ethnic casting is shameful. I've never seen such a white show in all my born days." Um...hello? Have you ever seen the Hartnell years of Doctor Who? Or indeed, any other sixties TV? If you were saying it was the whitest show you'd seen this century, well, you might have a point. But by failing to think your words through properly, you have undermined yourself. Which is pretty bloody unfortunate given you're still the head writer on Who, and may explain why I'm considerably less excited than I ought to be about tomorrow.

"There is an unwritten rule in the blogosphere that it is wrong to delete nasty comments. It suggests that you can't take criticism but now there is a sense that this is nonsense," claims a "prominent blogger" (of whom I've never heard) who has received a death threat. So what you mean is, you can't take the heat?
"For women with families, it's constantly in the back of your mind that you're putting not just yourself but to some extent your family in the public eye,"
You're not Spider-Man. You're a blogger. Get the Hell over it.
"It could be that the time has come to professionalise what bloggers do". Translation - we made names for ourselves by operating outside the legislated, commercialised media structure, but now we're successful, we'd like to pull the ladder up behind us.
Everyone quoted in that article as favouring moderation, (self-)regulation, a blog equivalent to the Comics cocking Code or any other form of restraint is a bloody disgrace, who should either piss off to a traditional media outlet, or just shut up. Indeed, I note some of them have suspended their blogs in protest. Well, if that's your favoured tactic then please, protest away.

Even with the Big Two comics companies seemingly addicted to ever more all-encompassing Events, they're still putting out a few comics which are allowed to exist in worlds of their own, and often these are the most satisfying. Back before they decided to kill Captain America and the blacks, Ultimate Spider-Man was one of Marvel's highest profile stories, but now it seems to be off in the corner, quietly doing its own thing. In part this is because of all the hullabaloo being attracted by the big stories in the main Marvel universe, and in part because USM did get in rather a lull for a year or two, but now, off the radar, it's come to rival newuniversal as the most unfettered, surprising, 'OMG!' comic Marvel are putting out, if not the best. I'd say something like five of the last ten issues have had genuinely jaw-dropping cliffhangers, and in this spoilered world, I cherish that.

*And also some distinctly slashy moments before the show, which would doubtless appeal to certain elements of the fanbase if only they had had time to establish such a thing.
alexsarll: (aim)
As it nears the end of its first series, Skins is moving increasingly from its pleasing teen fluff beginning to a land of dark neon and twisted mindgames; obviously, I'm loving it. Also, having met Tony's mentalist sister Effie, I'm now totally over Cassie.
Primeval went out on a different sort of high with its first time-travel story proper (as with most Doctor Who, previous episodes had used time travel to put the story's components in place, rather than actually telling stories about time travel). But as brilliant as it was to see Claudia Sound of Thundered, or realise who the camp was, for me the finest moment was Cutter shooting the super-evolved bat-thing from the future. What made the scene was that he didn't say "we're not dead yet", because he didn't need to; it was all in the eyes, a territorial triumphalism far older than language.

We had been warned in advance that the local Tesco would be spending this week closed for refurbishment (presumably it's just not sexy enough for Stroud Green Road anymore), but it seems a bit harsh that on its last day open it was almost entirely bereft of so many staples - the shelves normally devoted to bread, milk and fruit wouldn't have been out of place under communism. How are we meant to provision for the closure like that?

I remain deeply disappointed in myself over my performance at Quasar (although at least our team still won) but I managed to wash some of the salt out of the wound at the thoroughly enjoyable Guided Missile night. I liked the Duloks' shouty girl pop and Silvery's moments of sounding like Sparks, but bloody Hell they have short songs; in comparison, the Low Edges were practically prog, and I think they managed 13 songs in their brief set. Excellent as ever, obviously.

There's something at once reassuring and terrifying in learning that even Susan Sontag, towards the end, "spoke with leaden sadness of time wasted" - because it's a reminder that none of us, no matter how thoroughly we try to live life to the full, can ever escape the shadow of that great affront, mortality.
Likewise, knowing that even Susan Sontag felt "It is from reading that I derive the standards by which I measure my own work and according to which I fall lamentably short" is at once a sanction for, and a corrective to, the sensation that with so many things one wants to read, it's a bit of a waste of everyone's time to write - because what if she'd let that stop her?
Then again, all this was learned in a piece by her son introducing one of her last essays, in which we were reminded that even Susan Sontag could be grotesquely wrong at times. Her generalised attacks on television might apply to daytime pap, but if she lets that stand for the whole then she's forgetting Sturgeon's Law - 90% of everything is rubbish. She should have watched more HBO, and seen TV in a flourish of creativity comparable to Renaissance London theatre, happening right now.
alexsarll: (Default)
There were far, far too many things on offer last night, but I opted for the Prom (because it's so rare these days) and then Gloomy (because it's only down the road). The latter was pretty much the [livejournal.com profile] wilteddaffodil Show, and none the worse for that. To my surprise, Str8X +1 turned up at one point, but either they vanished again after not too long, or that place's stealth properties are getting worse. Ended up walking home on account of TFL's inability to run enough N19s that they're not all full by the time they get to Angel, but it's a pleasant enough stroll. Also, while being in black tie for the Prom is pretty much expected, it giving one the excuse to be in black tie for Upper St, Gloomy &c is just plain fun.

Primeval couldn't just stick to freaky quadrupeds turning up in forests, then - it's ranging around the prehistoric eras, and the country, and this time we got things with more than six legs. In the Tube. The first victim having entered the network one stop down from me, and one lucky escapee standing where I tend to in full carriages. I may be avoiding the Piccadilly Line for a bit.

Yesterday afternoon I felt in need of a walk, headed down to the park and then just sort of...kept going, Among the sights I saw on a sort of pentagonal loop through St Ann's and Haringey were a building proudly emblazoned with the name Low Profile House (even if it was only visible from a section of the New River Path which felt more like a particularly clogged section of the New River than solid ground), and a sign to the Crusader Industrial Estate sensitively positioned next to a mosque.

Speaking of the monotheists, I was reading a rather charming piece about a surviving cargo cult, and my irony buffers almost overloaded at this part:
"A Christian youth worker told me how he thought the cult was childish. "It's like a baby playing games," he insisted. "Those people are holding on to a dream that will never come true," he said."
Yes, because they want someone from 50 years ago to come back, whereas wanting someone from 2000 years ago to come back is far more sensible, isn't it?

Is it just me, or does the shaved head sort of suit Britney? Maybe I just think this because it's an outward symbol that she's now very much within my type, viz. 'mad girls'.

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718192021 2223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 29th, 2025 12:40 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios