alexsarll: (death bears)
The new Morrissey album, based on two listens, is deeply patchy, and the new Anthony & the Johnsons is basically the same as the last one, but slightly less so. More to my surprise, given I liked You Could Have It So Much Better, first impressions of the new Franz Ferdinand are that for the most part, it's a bloody mess. [livejournal.com profile] icecoldinalex, this means that thus far you're still Album of the Year.

I know BSG's Number Six Cylon was named in honour of The Prisoner, but I'd never thought the parallels went much beyond that. I'm reconsidering in light of Season Three, where as with my Prisoner DVD, all the faintly pointless episodes seem to be contained on Disc Four. Homage!
Anyway, I have now finished the third season. Frakking Hell.

Finished The Worm Ouroboros and...well, I'm not cutting this, it was written near 90 years ago, but if you're planning to read it for the plot then look away now. I know the title should have given this away, but in some senses I have never read a more pointless book. Our heroes break the power of Witchland utterly - and then sit around moping, worrying that life will never again offer them anything so awesome as that war. This a war in which, aside from the danger to themselves and the deaths of their men, their land was despoiled and one of their sisters damn near raped. This in a book written by an Englishman mere years after the War To End All Wars might even seem, at terrible cost, to have succeeded. So by calling in a boon from the gods - they resurrect Witchland and take us right back to the start! I've seen the idea of Valhallan eternal war crop up a few times for examination in art - Grant Morrison was intrigued by it in early days, from his climactic Zoids to the Warner Bros deconstruction of 'The Coyote Gospel'. But I'm hard pressed to think of anything else written since the Middle Ages which quite so unambiguously celebrates that idea, particularly when the conflict encompasses innocents as well as the protagonists.
As a palate cleanser, have now moved on to the charming eccentricity of Dry Store Room No. 1. This has already been extensively blogged of late by my friendslist, so I shall restrain myself to mentioning how glad I am that I started this *after* my recent return visit to the Natural History Museum, such that when Richard Fortey says:
"There are still galleries in the Natural History Museum displaying minerals, the objects themselves - a kind of museum of a museum, preserved in aspic from the days of such systematic rather than thematic exhibits. Few people now find their way to these galleries."
- and think, after the Great Hall, that was the first place I went! And I got to surreptitiously touch a thing from another world, some witch-iron! It wouldn't be nearly so much fun if that had happened the other way round; I'd feel like I was being worthy, being watched, rather than naturally doing the right thing.
alexsarll: (puss)
Kinsey lapses at times into the standard Hollywood biopic template, but never quite becomes the Comic Strip version of events it could so easily have been. Neeson's a perfect lead - he's not the hunk a studio might have preferred, but he has sufficient charisma that watching him 'at it' isn't painful, and sufficient talent to carry off the complexities of a role that sometimes verges on unlikeable. He's also subtle enough that he doesn't need to grandstand (much) to let us see that Kinsey was a bloody hero. At great cost to himself, this man helped drag the US (and by extension, the world) out of a dark age to which many would still like to return us.
(And for those of us who've seen all the superhero films, it's amusing to see Batman's mentor bumming Robin, all paid for by a grant from Curt Connors.)

Attempting to film Saint Trinian's, on the other hand, was never going to work. Ronald Searle's cartoons are immortal - even animating them would be as pointless as those short-lived Far Side animations. Attempting to turn them into real people? Wouldn't even work in the era of Sin City, and certainly didn't in the fifties. Seriously, what were they thinking? Did they also try to film Molesworth, or Grecian urns?
Still, at least I now realise where Daphne & Celeste got their name.

Newsnight showed the item on Soho I thought I'd missed, in which one dealer sensibly responded to residents' complaints by pointing out that they knew what the area was like when they moved in - "it's fvcking S0d0m and Gomorrah round here". He didn't seem a particularly pleasant chap, but I was on his side in this matter even before I saw that the crusading councillor is the sort of person who uses Excel when he should be using Access. But this was not the show's highlight, and nor was Ed Miliband showing a TV manner which makes Charles Clarke look like a born presenter. Oh no.
We got to see Jeremy Paxman versus Jon Snow. I mean, shouldn't that have been trailed for weeks ahead of time? That's a crossover classic. Even without the moment when Paxman intimated that he'd like to garotte George Galloway, this would have been What Television Is For. But it did not stand alone - beforehand Jeremy was on Jermyn Street asking about ties, for all the world like Viv Stanshall asking whether shirts had a future. And afterwards, it was Strip Newsnight, with Paxman taking his tie off as he read out today's headlines. Madness! Epochal madness, at that!

I'm off work tomorrow, so don't expect me online - though if anyone's going to see Antony & the Johnsons in the evening, you might see me there. And at some point over the weekend I think I may go see that giant desk on the Heath.

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718192021 2223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 03:33 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios