(no subject)
Jan. 23rd, 2008 11:05 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Cristina Odone was the one with the 'some of my best friends are gay but they can't have children so I wouldn't want them running the country' article of past blogosphere notoriety, wasn't she?* Certainly a quick Google confirms that her politics are odiously Catholic. Anyway, she was just on Newsnight, backing David Cameron's defence of parents who lie about faith to get their children a decent education. And even if I didn't know her past form, her poisonous, sanctimonious manner and pernicious arguments would have seen her added to the list headed "I wouldn't normally hit a woman, but..."
I only caught this because I'm finding What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? a bit much, and having to take it in instalments; the supporting cast are almost uniformly dreadful, but at its heart are Joan Crawford and Bette Davis giving the performances of their lives. It's a bit like Gaslight except so much better because, in their own very different styles, they're *both* driving each other doolally. Hollywood Gothic at its best. In fact, is there any other Hollywood Gothic? Perhaps not. Oh well.
Torchwood somewhat back to its bad old ways this week, but still with enough silliness in the margins to redeem it from the first season's low points. Fingers crossed for the rest, eh?
*edit:
bathtubgingirl reminds me that that was in fact Lowri Turner. My mistake, though I'm pretty sure they'd get on. Not get off, though. That would be gay, and thus evil.
I only caught this because I'm finding What Ever Happened To Baby Jane? a bit much, and having to take it in instalments; the supporting cast are almost uniformly dreadful, but at its heart are Joan Crawford and Bette Davis giving the performances of their lives. It's a bit like Gaslight except so much better because, in their own very different styles, they're *both* driving each other doolally. Hollywood Gothic at its best. In fact, is there any other Hollywood Gothic? Perhaps not. Oh well.
Torchwood somewhat back to its bad old ways this week, but still with enough silliness in the margins to redeem it from the first season's low points. Fingers crossed for the rest, eh?
*edit:
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:27 pm (UTC)"During production, Bette Davis had a Coca-Cola machine installed on the set to anger Joan Crawford, whose late husband had been CEO of rival Pepsi-Cola and who herself was on the board of directors of that company."
"During the kicking scene, Bette Davis kicked Joan Crawford in the head, and the resulting wound required stitches. In retaliation, Crawford put weights in her pockets so that when Davis had to drag Crawford's near-lifeless body, she strained her back."
oh and this one: "While touring the talk show circuit to promote the movie, Bette Davis told one interviewer that when she and Joan Crawford were first suggested for the leads in this film, Warner Bros. studio head Jack L. Warner replied: "I wouldn't give a plugged nickel for either one of those two old broads." Recalling the story, Davis laughed at her own expense. The following day, she reportedly received a telegram from Crawford: "In future, please do not refer to me as an old broad!""
no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-23 11:39 pm (UTC)hollywood gothic
Date: 2008-01-23 11:55 pm (UTC)Re: hollywood gothic
Date: 2008-01-24 12:00 am (UTC)Re: hollywood gothic
Date: 2008-01-24 12:42 am (UTC)Re: hollywood gothic
Date: 2008-01-24 07:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 01:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 07:25 pm (UTC)Joan Crawford and Bette Davis giving the performances of their lives
Date: 2008-01-24 02:26 am (UTC)Re: Joan Crawford and Bette Davis giving the performances of their lives
Date: 2008-01-24 02:31 am (UTC)Re: Joan Crawford and Bette Davis giving the performances of their lives
Date: 2008-01-24 07:28 pm (UTC)And Mildred Pierce is...I don't know, it's good, but it's still just a very good entry in the genre Women's Pictures, whereas this one stands alone. And while I like Bette Davis usually, I like her in a backgroundy sort of way - films I watch with pleasure and then forget. Except All About Eve, but like I said above I find that similar to this, but less so.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 10:26 am (UTC)and re Odone: SHE WAS THE EDITOR OF THE CATHOLIC HERALD! Were you seriously expecting a sensible liberal outlook?
no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-25 03:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-25 03:13 pm (UTC)although news'light' would be good. I think i want to hear more of paxman's views on underpants. and what kirsty wark thinks of britney spears, that kind of thing.
no subject
Date: 2008-01-26 10:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 12:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-01-24 07:31 pm (UTC)