![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Welcome to Lockdown London, where anyone who lives on the Victoria line is now being put to bed at a nice early hour on schoolnights. Supposedly it's so the line can be upgraded - and heavens know it needs an upgrade even to reach 'basic functionality', across Friday and Monday it was out on three of the four occasions when I needed it - but as with the smoking ban, it does rather fit the Spirit of the Age, in which our new PM feels obliged to make deeply unconvincing denials of his puritan tendencies while he initiates what looks like a surreptitious War On Fun. Fortunately, Finsbury Park offered local comedy for local people in a local living room, as Carey Marx tested out his Edinburgh show. The problem being, he was testing it on Us Lot, so obviously the material about rape, disability and mistaking babies for poos was going to get all the biggest laughs. Meaning we've sent him off to Edinburgh concentrating on all the material which, to an audience of tender sensibilities, is most likely to get him lynched, and there's a limit to how far even Parsnip the Teddy can defuse matters. Although - that in itself would be fairly amusing.
Like Harry Potter, like its own Mark Antony, Rome made a good end. OK, I'm sad that it was cancelled - and unsure how different the second season would have been were it not - but this was a season end which followed naturally (and as faithfully to history as the series ever was) from what had gone before, and out of which nothing naturally follows. Where would we have gone, after the grand wars of the Republic's fall - into the comparatively petty manoeuvrings by which Augustus cemented his position? Or skipping to the period already handled so marvellously by I, Claudius? They had enough problems working around Shakespeare, giving us a secret history of those events - I,C already was a secret history, so you'd lose that space. No, better to end it here, after two seasons of spite and shagging and swordplay, with the giants dead and the monster enthroned.
Further thought on Deathly Hallows: we never found out what happened to Dolores Umbridge, did we? I'd love to think that they'd have a more thorough purge of the Death Eaters and their sympathisers this time around, but she strikes me as too good a bureaucratic operator, the sort who always comes out on top. Which means that arguably the most hateful character in the entire sequence may well have escaped unscathed.
Oh, and I know pointing and laughing at imbeciles on comments pages is a bit fish/barrel, but I couldn't resist this particular peon, denouncing Potter and declaiming grandly about Literacy and Art while demonstrating a spectacular inability to spell or structure a sentence. Part of me suspects he must be a spoof.
(The Earthsea snobs, by the way, are beginning to get even more shaming for their source than the loopier elements of Potter fandom. But then, le Guin lacks Rowling's personal dignity, so what can one expect of the followers?)
Like Harry Potter, like its own Mark Antony, Rome made a good end. OK, I'm sad that it was cancelled - and unsure how different the second season would have been were it not - but this was a season end which followed naturally (and as faithfully to history as the series ever was) from what had gone before, and out of which nothing naturally follows. Where would we have gone, after the grand wars of the Republic's fall - into the comparatively petty manoeuvrings by which Augustus cemented his position? Or skipping to the period already handled so marvellously by I, Claudius? They had enough problems working around Shakespeare, giving us a secret history of those events - I,C already was a secret history, so you'd lose that space. No, better to end it here, after two seasons of spite and shagging and swordplay, with the giants dead and the monster enthroned.
Further thought on Deathly Hallows: we never found out what happened to Dolores Umbridge, did we? I'd love to think that they'd have a more thorough purge of the Death Eaters and their sympathisers this time around, but she strikes me as too good a bureaucratic operator, the sort who always comes out on top. Which means that arguably the most hateful character in the entire sequence may well have escaped unscathed.
Oh, and I know pointing and laughing at imbeciles on comments pages is a bit fish/barrel, but I couldn't resist this particular peon, denouncing Potter and declaiming grandly about Literacy and Art while demonstrating a spectacular inability to spell or structure a sentence. Part of me suspects he must be a spoof.
(The Earthsea snobs, by the way, are beginning to get even more shaming for their source than the loopier elements of Potter fandom. But then, le Guin lacks Rowling's personal dignity, so what can one expect of the followers?)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 06:32 pm (UTC)Don't get me wrong, the first three at least are bloody good - but even as a kid they weren't my very favourites or anything. I certainly never raced through 600 pages of them in 24 hours.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 06:44 pm (UTC)Point taken re: fans, but I think even a grown-up coming across that childish is better than coming off as groundlessly snooty in the very *dry* way the worst of the Earthsea lot do. I guess that, within fantasy, they're the equivalent of the lit types who look down on fantasy en masse.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 07:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 07:14 pm (UTC)(But my suspicion for the future - married to Professor Longbottom)
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 07:14 pm (UTC)Clearly.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 07:16 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:23 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:24 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:26 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:27 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:28 pm (UTC)Ginny is now obsessed with James May. Is it normal for a cat to have such a telly addiction? :S
Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:31 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:33 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:37 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:37 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:45 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:33 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:35 pm (UTC)I've started calling him Ronnie. He is not impressed. :D
Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:38 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 07:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 07:16 pm (UTC)I did like the absence of a Smollett-style settling of accounts.
More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:23 pm (UTC)Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:36 pm (UTC)Just a thought.
Re: More HP/kitten things
Date: 2007-07-24 07:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-24 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 06:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 06:39 pm (UTC)The comment as regards le Guin herself relates to her complaints over the TV Earthsea (http://www.slate.com/id/2111107/) - one of those remarkable instances where, even though I'm basically on someone's side, they manage to put their case so badly that I turn against them. Don't sell your child to the Gypsies and then complain about the colour of their headscarf, Ursula. You should think about these things *before* you sign any contracts.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:21 pm (UTC)And neither do I see people INSISTING Potter is a diluted Earthsea, there are plenty of people saying it's superior and presenting their reasons as their own opinion. But if you want to strike some victimhood on Potter (which hardly needs it) then yes of course there's always going to be massmarket vs a more cultish appeal, linguistic-magic vs... well, whatever the hell "magic" is in the Potter books. I wouldn't agree Potter is a diluted Earthsea as personally I don't think it's that good!! I've still read the Potter book, but I can't seperate it from the mass media hype anymore, and I'd invested gradually in the characters over time (again the hype was a helping hand here). But I doubt old JK wanted to write another Earthsea - apart from featuring magic they tell stories that are literally worlds and dimensions apart.
I am cross!!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:29 pm (UTC)I agree as regards Potter and Earthsea basically having sod all direct relationship, and perhaps you've missed the worst of the snobbery to which I'm referring through avoiding certain geek realms - a lot of what I recall was on a now-defunct geek forum (what's on those threads echoes it without, for the most part, being quite so objectionable). And as much as I liked Earthsea, I generally ended up pointing out that at least Rowling had never gone so fundamentally off her own rails as Tehanu, and then shutting down my browser in a huff.
The only effect the hype has had on my relationship with the Potter books is to mean I read them in more of a hurry so as not to get spoiled.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:42 pm (UTC)I don't think your last sentence is the full story - you've seen the films, you've read the fluff pieces in the media (including the media that you gravitate towards), you mix with people who write Harry Potter "slash" (I am assuming here, BUT I BET YOU DO!) - it will have so much more of your headspace than the new YOUNG BOND book. (Young Bond is also better! Charlie Higson 4tw)!
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 08:55 pm (UTC)I am *aware* of the Potter publicity cloud, obviously, but it doesn't get in between me and the book. And even then, I'm perhaps not as aware as you think - first film aside, I only see them once they hit the TV (meaning I'm currently two behind). And in large part this is *because* Rowling got her way - they're so faithful as to be superfluous.
I distrust the idea of young versions of characters. I suspect Young Sherlock Holmes may be to blame.
no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 10:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-29 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 09:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-07-25 06:40 pm (UTC)The Piccadilly is fine for central stuff, but I'm going to spend twice as long getting back from next week's Brixton gig as I normally would. And how about the Walthamstow types? Will somebody think of the Walthies?