Rain and robots
Jul. 15th, 2009 02:30 pmSo if it's scattered showers on St Swithin's Day, does that mean it'll rain for some of the next 40 days, but not all? Cheers, Swithin. That's really useful. You berk.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen lacks some of the dynamism of the first film. Those wonderful, protean fights, where transformation became a kind of martial art in itself, have given way to a more old-school model where a vehicle turns into a robot and then hits stuff. Nor does it have the emotional heft of the old stories - there's a thing happens here which also happened in the animated movie, and this time it didn't make me cry. Plus, it probably didn't help that instead of seeing it on the biggest screen in Leicester Square with the hall full of fans, I was in a sparsel-populated (availability 'few', indeed!) Screen 8 at Wood Green Cineworld.
You could, if you wished, read a political message into it - especially given the guy who wants America to hang its allies out to dry is called Galloway. Frankly, I don't think going down that road would be very productive. But, it has more robots. Bigger robots. And they hit each other lots. And have more guns. And more OTT dialogue. And fight some army hardware too. And most of the 'human' segments of the plot aim for comedy but come straight out the other side at 'lunacy'. It riffs on other films, but only big ones - Titanic, Indiana Jones (must be odd for Shia), Weird Science. The whole thing, while not quite as deranged as some reviews had me hoping, appears to be the work of a hormonall-unbalanced 12-year old boy somehow given access to the best noughties CGI and the US military have to offer. Which means that, fundamentally, it kicks arse. On the big screen, that is - I imagine it would be utter nonsense on a TV or laptop.
Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen lacks some of the dynamism of the first film. Those wonderful, protean fights, where transformation became a kind of martial art in itself, have given way to a more old-school model where a vehicle turns into a robot and then hits stuff. Nor does it have the emotional heft of the old stories - there's a thing happens here which also happened in the animated movie, and this time it didn't make me cry. Plus, it probably didn't help that instead of seeing it on the biggest screen in Leicester Square with the hall full of fans, I was in a sparsel-populated (availability 'few', indeed!) Screen 8 at Wood Green Cineworld.
You could, if you wished, read a political message into it - especially given the guy who wants America to hang its allies out to dry is called Galloway. Frankly, I don't think going down that road would be very productive. But, it has more robots. Bigger robots. And they hit each other lots. And have more guns. And more OTT dialogue. And fight some army hardware too. And most of the 'human' segments of the plot aim for comedy but come straight out the other side at 'lunacy'. It riffs on other films, but only big ones - Titanic, Indiana Jones (must be odd for Shia), Weird Science. The whole thing, while not quite as deranged as some reviews had me hoping, appears to be the work of a hormonall-unbalanced 12-year old boy somehow given access to the best noughties CGI and the US military have to offer. Which means that, fundamentally, it kicks arse. On the big screen, that is - I imagine it would be utter nonsense on a TV or laptop.