alexsarll: (Default)
Those of you so consumed with sorrow at Ken's exit - look on the bright side. Maybe now he'll have time to prepare some more of his diaries for publication.
Seriously, though - what exactly is it you're worried about? 'Traditionally Tory' (by which people these days seem to mean Thatcherite) stuff like an increase in London's rich/poor divide, and simmering racial tension? You may not have noticed, but we got all those under the last guy. And all this stuff about Boris being a buffoon, a joke...Ken used to be treated like that (anyone remember all the newt gags?), but then everyone realised it played to his advantage. He can hardly complain now he's finally been out-mavericked.
And before anyone calls me 'a Tory' (and how tiresome is it that in 2008, people still think of politics in terms of tribal party loyalties) - I didn't vote for them in the Assembly (I'm quite upset that even with my contribution, the Greens got no advance on their two seats), I've never voted for them at general or council elections, and I have no intention of doing so next time. I voted for Boris, a man who on many issues (the migrant amnesty and privatisation among them) is to the left not only of his own party, but of the entity still trading as Labour. I voted for him based on his policies - and those are his actual policies, not the Keystone Gestapo version some people seem to be expecting - not his hairstyle. Even if he disappoints me, as he may, as politicians normally do, as Ken certainly did in his second term...well, then he disappoints me, and next time I'll vote for someone else. And some of my friends will vote for him, and some of them won't, and I won't treat it as a cause never to speak to anyone again because that is not the noble tradition of British democracy, that is its nasty factionalist underbelly.
alexsarll: (bill)
Londoners; when you vote for the Mayor on Thursday, please remember that this is not a first-past-the-post election. I've never liked the usual defeatist line about votes for third parties being wasted; here it simply isn't true, and anyone who says otherwise is either underinformed or has a covert agenda. Here's m'learned colleague's explanation of how the system works, but in summary: if you're just voting Ken To Stop Boris, or Boris To Stop Ken, then your second preference vote is perfectly adequate to that task. Give Brian Paddick a chance, or Sian Berry, with the first preference, if only to help erode the deeply unsatisfactory idea of the two party system; a little more each time and maybe next election, it could even be a real three way battle. Or four.
And no, I'm not saying this as part of some convoluted plan to get Boris in; it's just about really wanting Ken out. For his cronyism, appointing unqualified members of his old fringe socialist group to high power at our expense. For smearing Peter Tatchell when Tatchell dared to criticise one of Ken's fundamentalist associates. For endorsing the appalling George Galloway's bid for a London Assembly seat. For describing Boris as a "19th century liberal, with a small L", and yet somehow intending that great compliment as a criticism.
I voted for Ken last time, albeit with reservations; I still think he did a lot of good in his first term. But this last term, the balance has tipped. London is not his personal fiefdom, and I would like to see him reminded of that, at the very least by a shaky performance in the first round.

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718192021 2223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 11:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios