That Kinks book I read sent me to Spotify in search of Preservation, mentioned in hushed tones as a grand folly of Ray Davies' wilderness years. And yes, musically it's dreadful. But the lyrics of the title track are timely:
The people were scared
They didn't know where to turn
They couldn't see any salvation
From the hoods and the spivs
And the crooked politicians
Who were cheating and lying to the nation
Crucial detail - they didn't know where to turn. I'm seeing a lot of people retreating into cosy tribalism over the Spending Review, choosing to believe that if Brown had somehow survived then things would be very different. Which may be a nice dream, but ignores his pre-election rhetoric and New Labour's record. Demonisation and squeezing of welfare claimants, Murdoch-approved bullying of the BBC, cossetting wealthy tax evaders - all straight from the New Labour playbook. The tuition fees now ballooning so obscenely were an introduction of New Labour's first term, their supposed golden age. Hell, even Ed Miliband's new non-New Labour are still holding disappointingly close to the idiotic consensus of toughness on the deficit, failing to distance themselves from their predecessors, failing to see that some economists a little more substantial than George and Gordon, people like Keynes and Krugman, offer a way at once kinder and more effective.
What else? Watched Mark Gatiss' intriguing adaptation of HG Wells' First Men in the Moon, which looked like it had made a little money go a long way. I expect we'll be seeing a lot more of that sort of make-do attitude given the BBC cuts snuck through in the Review. Had a first game of occult Nazis vs GI Joe killfest Tannhauser, which I suspect will be even better once we know the rules but was great fun even when played at retard level (at one stage I said "I'm going to move this man here and do shooty at that man." I hadn't even been drinking). Oh, and I picked up the first comic in a while which I've felt the need to post about. It's not that there haven't been any good comics lately, it's just that most of them have been in series which have been good for 30, 60, 120 issues now and are continuing to be good in much the same way - hardly worth posting about. And complaining about the disappointments always risks turning one into this guy (though it has to be said that hardcore Spider-Man fans are the comics fan's comics fans - who but the geekiest would look at all the heroes available, and choose as their avatar that schmuck Peter Parker?). Paul Cornell, whom some of you will know from his mostly excellent Doctor Who work, also writes some very good comics. Probably the best of which was his Captain Britain and MI:13, tragically cancelled in large part because nobody outside Britain was reading the thing. So he's gone over to DC and somehow persuaded them to let him do a miniseries with Knight & Squire, the British Batman & Robin, which is even more British. Here's the first page, with the opening line "Tch! What a palaver about a bit of how's-your-father!" Which I suppose means I can end on a certain note of "there'll always be an England" consolation. Heavens know I need it.
The people were scared
They didn't know where to turn
They couldn't see any salvation
From the hoods and the spivs
And the crooked politicians
Who were cheating and lying to the nation
Crucial detail - they didn't know where to turn. I'm seeing a lot of people retreating into cosy tribalism over the Spending Review, choosing to believe that if Brown had somehow survived then things would be very different. Which may be a nice dream, but ignores his pre-election rhetoric and New Labour's record. Demonisation and squeezing of welfare claimants, Murdoch-approved bullying of the BBC, cossetting wealthy tax evaders - all straight from the New Labour playbook. The tuition fees now ballooning so obscenely were an introduction of New Labour's first term, their supposed golden age. Hell, even Ed Miliband's new non-New Labour are still holding disappointingly close to the idiotic consensus of toughness on the deficit, failing to distance themselves from their predecessors, failing to see that some economists a little more substantial than George and Gordon, people like Keynes and Krugman, offer a way at once kinder and more effective.
What else? Watched Mark Gatiss' intriguing adaptation of HG Wells' First Men in the Moon, which looked like it had made a little money go a long way. I expect we'll be seeing a lot more of that sort of make-do attitude given the BBC cuts snuck through in the Review. Had a first game of occult Nazis vs GI Joe killfest Tannhauser, which I suspect will be even better once we know the rules but was great fun even when played at retard level (at one stage I said "I'm going to move this man here and do shooty at that man." I hadn't even been drinking). Oh, and I picked up the first comic in a while which I've felt the need to post about. It's not that there haven't been any good comics lately, it's just that most of them have been in series which have been good for 30, 60, 120 issues now and are continuing to be good in much the same way - hardly worth posting about. And complaining about the disappointments always risks turning one into this guy (though it has to be said that hardcore Spider-Man fans are the comics fan's comics fans - who but the geekiest would look at all the heroes available, and choose as their avatar that schmuck Peter Parker?). Paul Cornell, whom some of you will know from his mostly excellent Doctor Who work, also writes some very good comics. Probably the best of which was his Captain Britain and MI:13, tragically cancelled in large part because nobody outside Britain was reading the thing. So he's gone over to DC and somehow persuaded them to let him do a miniseries with Knight & Squire, the British Batman & Robin, which is even more British. Here's the first page, with the opening line "Tch! What a palaver about a bit of how's-your-father!" Which I suppose means I can end on a certain note of "there'll always be an England" consolation. Heavens know I need it.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:31 am (UTC)That comic sounds good.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-23 09:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:41 am (UTC)But I didn't realise "plonker" mean willy.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:49 am (UTC)"You is jarring me, blud" is the response on the second page to what you've just seen. Which is even better than that page by itself.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-23 09:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:55 am (UTC)Is it Preservation Act, then? I assumed it was Preservation, Acts I and II.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 10:56 am (UTC)But does it leave me wanting to jump ship and join Labour? The answer is no. The real witch-hunt against claimants and immigrants in particular came on their watch, and as you point out correctly it was New Labour in the form of that odious man Blunkett who introduced tuition fees. Not even Thatcher dared to try that. As I look at Not Very Red Ed, I don't see a man who's likely to be inviting Bob Crow up to Dartmouth Park for beer and sandwiches in a hurry. I fear they'll still be godawful on civil liberties no matter what Ed says, what with the likes of Woolas elected as a shadow minister and Luke "The Nuke" Akehurst now on the NEC.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-22 11:13 am (UTC)It may just be living in London, but my generally pro-union sensibilities have a large gap where that ridiculous man Crow is concerned. Not least because he plays into every Murdoch stereotype of what all union bosses are like. I'm not planning to join Ed's Labour, certainly - not least because I'm not a joiner. But depending how the next five years pan out, I could consider voting for them. Especially since proposed boundary changes could mean the traitor Corbyn would no longer be my local candidate.
no subject
Date: 2010-10-23 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-23 12:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-10-23 12:45 pm (UTC)