Doctor Who, of course
Nov. 15th, 2009 09:55 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I hadn't been all that excited about Waters of Mars. I try my best to avoid spoilers, but I'd still encountered enough to make me very, very excited about Tennant's final outings as the Doctor and the Christmas regeneration. Especially after the lacklustre Planet of the Dead, this just seemed like another contractual obligation, a roadbump in the way. Until I saw the last trailer with the Doctor telling the crew of Bowie Base One that he was very sorry, but this was a fixed point, and he had to let them die. Then, suddenly, I was excited. And for two thirds of the episode that was what we seemed to get - and it was wonderful, if deeply stressful. To be honest, I wasn't that concerned about the crew or the soggy zombies after them - good effects and all, but they were there to die. It was the Doctor I felt for, his mingled duty and curiosity, his sorrow at his own powerlessness. Not that I ever felt he was under threat, past one shout of 'Get your suit on, Doctor!' when the water was running in.
And then the bait and switch, and "The Laws of Time are mine and they will obey me", and I'm too staggered to punch the air but oh my life, this is amazing. This is the route to the godhead hinted at from time to time, especially in the Moffat stories (I half-expected Gadget to open the TARDIS door by clicking its manipulators). I always love it when a hero throws off the constraints of mortality and becomes a god, and this was up there with Kal El's 'Mother, Father, I love you, but you were wrong. I am no man. I am Superman."
Except...why has he taken them back to Earth in the same time zone? Why not hide them in the past or the future - I expected it to be somewhere out in the depths of space and time where a great-descendant of Adelaid Brooke could meet the originator of it all, John Wyndham's Outward Urge (a definite influence) meets DC One Million. When Adelaide doesn't feel up to sharing the Doctor's responsibility, why not just nip in, get rid of the body then go get the other two and take them on a long trip? You're not out of control, Doctor. You did the right thing. No need to emote, now go save the Time Lords. And fuck the Ood, they're not all that.
None of which is to deny that I'm now even more psyched up about The End of Time than I was before I got excited about Waters of Mars.
Not the only Who showing at the moment, of course, because there's also The Sarah Jane Adventures. Except, half of this series has been written by the same Phil Ford who collaborated on Waters of Mars, and yet all his teatime stories have all been utter drivel. Yes, you can say 'it's only a kid's show' - and that's precisely what Ford must do, because every one of his stories has been an exercise in dumb 'will this do?', as against fine work by all the other writers. But the worst of the lot was last week's outing, Mona Lisa's Revenge. To spoiler you less than the trailer does: Clyde, the rebellious one of Sarah Jane's kid sidekicks, is suddenly revealed to have always been a gifted artist. So much so that he has won a competition (with some really bad graffiti-style girls-with-guns work) and the class have been invited to see the unveiling of the Mona Lisa, on its first loan outside the Louvre. A loan to a gallery run by a man who was apparently barred from the Louvre for his obsession with the Mona Lisa, so that obviously makes perfect sense. Except, oh noes, the Mona Lisa has come to life! Where she is played by someone who looks nothing like the Mona Lisa, can't act, and has apparently been chosen just because somebody thought it would be jolly funny if for no apparent reason, the Mona Lisa had a Northern accent. Now, all of this is pretty poor in and of itself. But what makes it really special is that the Mona Lisa has already been key to a Doctor Who story. Not some pissy little book or audio or whatever, either, but one of the best stories in the original series' TV history, the Douglas Adams/Tom Baker/Lalla Ward classic City of Death. Ford is writing for a spin-off while either never having seen this story, being too stupid to remember it, or being arrogant enough that he thinks he can go clodhopping all over it for some cheap laughs which don't even come off.
But hey, at least he's not writing the series finale.
Oh, and while we've had occasional updates as to what original kid sidekick Maria has been up to since she moved to America, her dad, nice Alan Jackson, can now be seen as priapic, indolent English professor Matt Beer in Channel 4's so-so new comedy pilot Campus. Which is quite disturbing.
And then the bait and switch, and "The Laws of Time are mine and they will obey me", and I'm too staggered to punch the air but oh my life, this is amazing. This is the route to the godhead hinted at from time to time, especially in the Moffat stories (I half-expected Gadget to open the TARDIS door by clicking its manipulators). I always love it when a hero throws off the constraints of mortality and becomes a god, and this was up there with Kal El's 'Mother, Father, I love you, but you were wrong. I am no man. I am Superman."
Except...why has he taken them back to Earth in the same time zone? Why not hide them in the past or the future - I expected it to be somewhere out in the depths of space and time where a great-descendant of Adelaid Brooke could meet the originator of it all, John Wyndham's Outward Urge (a definite influence) meets DC One Million. When Adelaide doesn't feel up to sharing the Doctor's responsibility, why not just nip in, get rid of the body then go get the other two and take them on a long trip? You're not out of control, Doctor. You did the right thing. No need to emote, now go save the Time Lords. And fuck the Ood, they're not all that.
None of which is to deny that I'm now even more psyched up about The End of Time than I was before I got excited about Waters of Mars.
Not the only Who showing at the moment, of course, because there's also The Sarah Jane Adventures. Except, half of this series has been written by the same Phil Ford who collaborated on Waters of Mars, and yet all his teatime stories have all been utter drivel. Yes, you can say 'it's only a kid's show' - and that's precisely what Ford must do, because every one of his stories has been an exercise in dumb 'will this do?', as against fine work by all the other writers. But the worst of the lot was last week's outing, Mona Lisa's Revenge. To spoiler you less than the trailer does: Clyde, the rebellious one of Sarah Jane's kid sidekicks, is suddenly revealed to have always been a gifted artist. So much so that he has won a competition (with some really bad graffiti-style girls-with-guns work) and the class have been invited to see the unveiling of the Mona Lisa, on its first loan outside the Louvre. A loan to a gallery run by a man who was apparently barred from the Louvre for his obsession with the Mona Lisa, so that obviously makes perfect sense. Except, oh noes, the Mona Lisa has come to life! Where she is played by someone who looks nothing like the Mona Lisa, can't act, and has apparently been chosen just because somebody thought it would be jolly funny if for no apparent reason, the Mona Lisa had a Northern accent. Now, all of this is pretty poor in and of itself. But what makes it really special is that the Mona Lisa has already been key to a Doctor Who story. Not some pissy little book or audio or whatever, either, but one of the best stories in the original series' TV history, the Douglas Adams/Tom Baker/Lalla Ward classic City of Death. Ford is writing for a spin-off while either never having seen this story, being too stupid to remember it, or being arrogant enough that he thinks he can go clodhopping all over it for some cheap laughs which don't even come off.
But hey, at least he's not writing the series finale.
Oh, and while we've had occasional updates as to what original kid sidekick Maria has been up to since she moved to America, her dad, nice Alan Jackson, can now be seen as priapic, indolent English professor Matt Beer in Channel 4's so-so new comedy pilot Campus. Which is quite disturbing.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 10:17 pm (UTC)I've not read Outward Urge, but there seemed to be parallels with Alastair Reynolds' Pushing Ice- if Ten had dropped her off 500,000 years in the future they'd have felt even more obvious.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 10:35 pm (UTC)Never read any Reynolds past the blurbs, from which they always looked a bit like I'd seen it all before.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 10:54 pm (UTC)You probably have, but then there are no new ideas really are there? Reynolds is an ex-physicist, so while it is soft-SF he doesn't muck about with FTL, most of his novels play around with the Fermi Paradox in some way. If you do end up being interested I'd pick up Revelation Space or one of the standalones first.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 11:01 pm (UTC)I don't have a problem with FTL, being all too aware of how within the past 200 years scientists 'proved' that a steamship could never cross the Atlantic and that the human body would not survive speeds above 30mph.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 11:29 pm (UTC)I'm not sure that any engineer who actually built steamships believed the scientists who "proved" it couldn't be done. However this time round barring wormholes and other esoterica (which relativity allows) they do seem to have got it right.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:10 am (UTC)And yes, Brunel quite correctly failed to believe Dionysius Lardner. Similarly, whoever builds the first FTL drive will probably delight in showing Einstein et al to be full of holes. Although even once he's been superseded, he's never going to seem like as much of a prick as Newton does now. I think it's the photo with the tongue that'll save him.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 11:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 12:16 pm (UTC)(My personal favourite is the story where his name is known but his image as yet is not, and he's so bored of giving the talk, and his driver is so familiar with it from sitting in, that one evening they decide to swap. The chauffeur can even answer most of the questions after, because they're usually the same, except he does get one he doesn't know. So he looks ultra-bored, points at the real Einstein and says "That question is so simple, I'm going to let my driver answer it".
I don't even know whether this is apocryphal, but it really doesn't matter, because what's important is that Einstein is someone of whom it *could* be true)
no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 12:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 07:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 08:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 04:42 pm (UTC)Season 3 of Sarah Jane Adventures is blowing away Season 2, as far as I'm concerned. But they could do with a lot fewer Phil Ford scripts, it's true.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 04:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 10:42 pm (UTC)Also - Next Doctor had its moments! Though not enough of them, granted.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 11:00 pm (UTC)The Cybermassacre in the snow was ace. I think the Cyber-King blinded me to any other positives.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 11:04 pm (UTC)As for him 'finally cracking' - surely Nine was the cracked one and Ten is the rehabilitated model? But yeah, I suspect you're right about where RTD is going to take it for his last hurrah. Certainly this leaves us with more food for thought than either of the last two, which makes the scheduling (with such a short gap now as against the ages after those) even more of a puzzle.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 11:46 pm (UTC)Nine was cracked, but Ten has accumulated a whole other world of baggage. I think his reaction to the Bowie Base massacre would actually have made a lot more sense coming straight off the back of Journey's End, without TND and POTD in the middle.
I think the scheduling makes sense; after POTD I was happy to wait. After this, the next month can't be gone quick enough.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 11:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 12:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-17 10:11 pm (UTC)I... dunno. Because it was so clear Everyone Was Going To Die, there was no tension. Then he half-saved them in a lame and predictable way (Tardis!) that turned out not to be very well thought through. He's now neck and neck with Aslan for Least Actually Helpful Although Supposedly Heroic Sci/Fantasy Lead.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-18 09:37 am (UTC)He does save the entire world/universe/multiverse quite a lot, so I think he can be forgiven the occasional off day.
I was personally expecting "I'm the goddamn Time Lord!", but your alternative would also have been more than acceptable.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 11:11 pm (UTC)I was surprised how good it was, actually. If only because it involved Waterzombies! SO much more could have been done with the Water Zombies!, even though perhaps less was done to keep up their 'mystery.'
You know my thoughts on the lastest Sarah Jane. It made absolutely no sense, too much shoehorning where all that was needed was a little oil.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-15 11:14 pm (UTC)I did not get to see your reaction to the second part of the SJA but no, I wasn't expecting it to change your mind any more than it did mine.
The soggy zombies were kind of a MacGuffin for me rather than a directly interesting monster. The effect seems to have done a great job of freaking some people out, though, and I guess no Who monster is going to be able to do that to everyone.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:07 am (UTC)Mona the Vampire Lisa more like. Clyde has to draw a GIANT BOWSHIP coming to life! Hm I wonder why Rusty hasn't hired me yet.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:14 am (UTC)And you may say you like haunted house set-ups, but there is 1 x actual haunted house story which you have yet to see and it is bobbins.
Rusty is on his way out, so I reckon CC that to Roberts and Moffat ASAP and you're in!
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:43 am (UTC)You have the weirest morals I have ever seen. :P
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 10:46 am (UTC)And I already had the SJA bit written up ready.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 11:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 11:10 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 11:12 am (UTC)And she didn't have to kill herself. She just couldn't face the idea of living with that responsibility. It was only the responsibility to be an inspiring grandmother, which lots of people manage fine, and is not a hundredth of the responsibility the Doctor has shouldered for centuries and so much more now he's the last.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 04:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 04:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 04:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 04:58 pm (UTC)The real disappointment of the episode for me was that it wasn't anywhere near "The Scariest Doctor Who Ever?", mainly because we'd already seen anything that qualified as a scary bit in the trailer.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 05:01 pm (UTC)I hadn't heard it hyped as 'the scariest ever' so wasn't bothered that it wasn't. TBH if Moffat's name isn't on the credits, for me it's unlikely to be in the running for that honour - but I know some people found it terrifying, so fair enough, it didn't totally fail to deliver the scares either.
no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-11-16 08:07 pm (UTC)