alexsarll: (Default)
[personal profile] alexsarll
The main reason I don't walk all the way into town more often is that I've never found a route I liked - until now. Setting off early for [livejournal.com profile] hoshuteki's birthday, I started off through the Gillespie Park walk by the railway*, where I was able to verify that I am in fact faster than a speeding locomotive if by 'speeding' we mean 'being held between Finsbury Park and Drayton Park to regulate the service". Then through somnolent Drayton Park to Highbury, right off Liverpool Road and slide through the leafy squares of Barnsbury; this has all felt like Arthur Machen territory but once you skip over the brief busy patch of King's Cross you hit the motherlode, the little streets off the Gray's Inn Road. And there you are, in Bloomsbury, which I realise I now think of as the heart of town.

[livejournal.com profile] publicansdecoy and [livejournal.com profile] obsessive_katy got married this weekend, which is lovely and all, ditto setting aside a dedicated 'raucous drunks' table at the dinner (yes, obviously I was on it), but the masterstroke was having the wedding in a zoo! With a snow leopard and pygmy hippos and "one of the world's most mysterious mammals, the Fosca"**. Also a toastmaster, which I am now contemplating as a future career since it appears to consist of getting drunk in a tailcoat at strangers' weddings and perving on the bride. And the Black Plastic DJs. More weddings like this, please. The day was only slightly marred by the journey home, on which I had a full and frank exchange of views with a fellow who felt that throwing a pastie in my face was fair comment given I have a big nose.

Sunday, alas, began for me with the news of two Doctor Who deaths - seventies producer Barry Letts and 'Horror of Glam Rock' guest star Stephen Gately. Very sad. Mostly spent the rest of the day reading, though I did take a brief walk around the park at dusk and found myself terrified by the skies, in which the advancing mountain ranges of cloud seemed to presage apocalypse rather than the lovely clear day we've got today. I did attempt to watch Ghost Rider (or as they call it in the Philippines, Spirited Racer) and...well, it does a lot of things right. Given how Peter Fonda comes across these days, and Easy Rider, casting him as the Devil in a film about motorbikes is brilliant. And the narrator from Big Lebowski as the gravedigger who explains the plot and is blatantly a previous rider, great decision. But...in the lead, Nicolas Cage. Who as has been the case for a decade plus now, is just annoying, and can't convey any emotion bar 'faintly amusing hangdog puzzlement'. And even when, after 50 minutes, he eventually turns into the Ghost Rider, you realise that while modern special effects can do a lot of things, having as the lead character a guy with a flaming skull for a head is still slightly beyond them. On the printed page it looks great, the image makes instant sense. On screen...nothing quite looks right about it.
So I turned over to watch the Pixar documentary instead. And bless them, what lovely guys they all seem to be. Tying back to Ghost Rider, it also makes me feel I was right not to worry about the Disney takeover of Marvel, because while it is very clear from what the Pixar people say that Disney did lose its way for a while and insist on churning out bland crap, it also seems clear that, with John Lasseter now in overall charge of the creative side at Disney as well as Pixar, and having kicked out all the execs who weren't creatives, Marvel will be in good hands.
And though I still have no great desire to see Up (possibly because it's directed by the same guy as Monsters Inc, my least favourite of the Pixars I've seen), I do now really want to see Wall-E. Could anyone possibly lend me the DVD?

Neil Gaiman posted a link to a story about small-town homophobes wanting to remove gay-themed books from the local library, which would be just a normal, dismal story of people who urgently need killing (the Christian Civil Liberties Union has to be the most nonsensically-named organisation since Campaign Against P0rn0graphy And Censorship) if it weren't for the name of the town: West Bend. Everyone reading those books is already a West Bender, so what's the problem?

*This option is unavailable on match days, though - that path is closed, just another of the thousand disruptions to everyone else's life which must be made for the sake of the thrice-damned footballists.
**And porcupines! And rhinos, which terrify me. And tamarins!

Date: 2009-10-12 10:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puzzled-anwen.livejournal.com
J, yesterday: "You know, when Barry/Alex dances, he dances very gothic-ly."

Date: 2009-10-12 10:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Out of the mouths of babes...but she was the one pairing a black dress and a top hat!

Date: 2009-10-12 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] puzzled-anwen.livejournal.com
Yeah, I think she's accepted her gothness of late...

Date: 2009-10-12 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
EMBRACE THE DARKNESS.

Date: 2009-10-12 10:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pippaalice.livejournal.com
ahahahahahahahahaha! The child is the best!

Foscas are amazing!
Alex: I don't think Wall-E is that great, Lizzy is bound to have it though.

Date: 2009-10-12 10:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Really? I even cried a little bit at the out-of-context clip they had on the documentary. Which I sometimes do with clips from things I have already seen in full, but I don't think I have ever done before when a clip was the first thing I've seen.
Admittedly they did later have another bit with some fat people farming which looked less good, but still.

Date: 2009-10-12 10:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pippaalice.livejournal.com
I dunno, I think I am a bit heartless but I just didn't like the robots fall in wuv thing that much. Wall-E himself is adorable though.

Date: 2009-10-12 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Robots in love bores me if it is robots doing big Star Trek-style monologues about 'have I emotions? Can I feel?' but when it is cute expressive *silent* robots...blub.

Date: 2009-10-12 01:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pippaalice.livejournal.com
I is cold and heartless! :-O

Date: 2009-10-12 01:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sbp.livejournal.com
I liked about 80% of it and liked the bits with humans less.

Date: 2009-10-12 02:01 pm (UTC)

Date: 2009-10-12 12:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kiss-me-quick.livejournal.com
I do! It is ace, though mostly just the first half.

Date: 2009-10-12 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
I am guessing that is the robots rather than the fat farmers? But yes, may I borrow it, please?

Date: 2009-10-12 06:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kiss-me-quick.livejournal.com
In theory, yes, but I haven't actually got round to watching it yet so I'd like to watch it first!

Date: 2009-10-13 08:35 am (UTC)
(deleted comment)

Date: 2009-10-12 12:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Clearly not enough of one to be *in* a zoo, which is probably for the best, right?
(deleted comment)

Date: 2009-10-12 01:25 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Would you not get a bit tired of all the gawpers, though?

Date: 2009-10-12 01:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sbp.livejournal.com
You'd get used to all the monkeys, no problem.

Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 11:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephens.livejournal.com
I am very much with you on Monsters Inc. being the worst of pixar's efforts and I think that Wall.E and Up are pretty much on a level, both having excellent first halves and then somewhat going down hill as the story has to be padded out from the initial ideas. Both worth seeing though imho.

Re: Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 01:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Apparently the 3D on Up is not all that so I will quite likely wait for a DVD loan there also.

Re: Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 02:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stephens.livejournal.com
3D is not all that full stop it seems to me, certainly not worth any extra money as it is.

Re: Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 05:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
It was brilliant on Coraline, the only film I have so far seen it on. To the extent that I'd be wary of watching it again at home, in fact.

Re: Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 01:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sbp.livejournal.com
I dunno, I liked MI, and preferred it to a Bug's Life, for e.g. Not a patch on Toy Story, obv.

Re: Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 01:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Too much hugging and learning for me.

I've not seen A Bug's Life, though. Or Cars, or Ratatouille, both of which looked from the trailers like they could easily be worse.

Re: Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 01:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sbp.livejournal.com
Cars is just so visually noisy it's hard to watch. Oh no, that's Robots, sorry. The story was OK but every scene was crammed with moving things. I didn't see Cars in the end.

Ratatouille was fine for its intended audience I think. Reminded me a bit of Kiki's Delivery Service or something like that.

Re: Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 05:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
But surely the point of good Pixar - or indeed Ghibli - films is that they don't have an 'intended audience', they work for anyone?

I also tend to confuse Cars and Robots, in spite of having seen neither.
(deleted comment)

Re: Cone of Shame

Date: 2009-10-12 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Will Self is the sort of name it's very hard to parody, but they may just have managed it there.

Date: 2009-10-12 06:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkmarcpi.livejournal.com
I liked it when the waitress serving our table commented "Ooh, you are a boozy lot, aren't you?"

Date: 2009-10-13 08:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
You have to admit she had a point. And wasn't that even before we started finding other sources?

Date: 2009-10-13 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkmarcpi.livejournal.com
Yes. I like to think we liberated other tables from the distressing burden of their undrunk booze.

Anyway, all this talk by various LJ-ers of ours being the raucous drunks table...I might have to do a disclaimer post stating that, although I was on said table, and irrespective of my behaviour that night, my default position is only 'drunk drunk', rather than 'raucous drunk'. He tells himself.

Date: 2009-10-13 06:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] fivelongdays.livejournal.com
I didn't know Barry Letts had died. Sad news indeed.

Date: 2009-10-13 08:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Yup, although he was 85 and I believe his wife had not long ago died, so he had a pretty good innings all told.

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718192021 2223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 13th, 2025 02:59 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios