alexsarll: (magnus)
Alex ([personal profile] alexsarll) wrote2009-09-30 11:19 am

Comics

I've cut down on how many comics I get lately - the obvious financial reasons don't intersect well with rising comics prices, and even beyond that there's a bit of a lull underway in the artform/industry anyway these past few months. But yesterday I picked up four weeks' worth, as well as having this week dropped in on a couple of libraries I've not visited in ages and found a stack of collections*. Not all superheroes, there are some crime ones and a goth sitcom thing, but mostly. And I've realised something - third-rate superhero comics are my celebrity mags. I can read a collection in twenty minutes or so, and if it doesn't improve my life in any meaningful way, I find it soothing nonetheless. And if it doesn't stand up by itself, it feeds into that vast tapestry that is a shared universe, just like the exclusive nightclubs of London and LA form a shared universe for a Heat reader; this would explain also why I can't continue reading a book or watching a TV show which I don't think is very good, but can carry on with a comic, so long as no expenditure is involved beyond time ie it's from the library. And fundamentally, you can't tell me Green Lantern is any more unreal than Lady Gaga.
Clearly I'm not talking about something like All-Star Superman, say, which is at once a truly first-class work of fiction and a holy book far preferable to any of the currently popular choices. A Watchmen or Enigma stands deservedly amongst the great literature of the past few decades, and even at the level below them you have stuff coming out at the moment like The Boys, Ultimate Spider-Man or Batman and Robin which, if not quite great art, are nonetheless so well-crafted as to justify themselves without embarrassment and outclass anything on this (or most) year's Booker shortlist.
Conversely, I'm not talking about the worst of the worst. Some of those I'll read when I get home from the pub, for the car-crash fascination of it. A little above them are the only things I won't touch at all, the ones which aren't atrocious beyond all reckoning but simply dull and miserable and confused - ie, the majority of DC's recent output. But between that and the good stuff there's a vast range of workmanlike, competent material - words I would use as an insult if applied to any other medium, pop especially, but which in comics, I find scratches an itch.
In summary: just because Facebook tells you I've read a comic, don't necessarily take that as a recommendation. I'm an addict.

*Plus a few actual books, I should add (Wodehouse, Arthur C Clarke, Anais Nin), but broadly speaking I still own literally hundreds of books I've not read, and almost no comics I haven't.

[identity profile] azureskies.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 10:37 am (UTC)(link)
Yes. There's definitely something in this, I think; it would explain, for example, the compulsion I have to know what's going on in various titles (particularly, in my case the wider scope of the DCU), even if I don't particularly want to read most of the individual titles themselves. I suppose that's comparable to people reading gossip about musicians/actors/etc whose actual work they're not necessarily interested in.

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 10:42 am (UTC)(link)
I used to work next to the celebrity desk, and it amazed me how often these people who were interested in celebs qua celebs would have no idea of the content of said celebs' work (in the case of celebs who actually produce anything, obviously). They'd end up with me or another colleague from a less glamorous department explaining to them the plot of a star's latest film/TV show, or the sound of their new album, and even then they'd only half pay attention - it was secondary to the clubs and the relationships and the spats.

[identity profile] braisedbywolves.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 04:24 pm (UTC)(link)
In both cases, that's why god gave us Wikipedia.

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2009-10-01 10:40 am (UTC)(link)
I've just been using same to check how come Pete Wisdom pretty conclusively died in a comic I just read from 2000, but then still appeared in possibly my favourite new superhero comic of the past few years. Its answer was distressingly vague.
(Said 2000 comic also had an X-team based in San Francisco, and an event which had caused all mutants to lose their powers. How things change, or not - I'm not so much surprised that Marvel repeated this as that no fans I know have pointed out the repetition)
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 10:43 am (UTC)(link)
It's very hard to draw a precise boundary, though - I made sure only to use clear-cut cases in the post, but I'm honestly not sure where I'd put eg Ultimates.
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 10:50 am (UTC)(link)
Oh dear me. But hey, at least it wasn't God Loves, Man Kills II...

(Was this by any chance on the John Byrne board?)
(deleted comment)

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 10:59 am (UTC)(link)
I only follow the urban myth bit and that's always on CBR anyway, thank heavens.

third-rate superhero comics are my celebrity mags

[identity profile] johnny-vertigen.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 10:47 am (UTC)(link)
This probably explains why I was reading Agents of ATLAS.

Re: third-rate superhero comics are my celebrity mags

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 10:51 am (UTC)(link)
Jeff Parker is a prime purveyor of the sort of thing I mean - his Spider-Man/Fantastic Four was one of the trades which set me thinking along these lines.

[identity profile] the-elyan.livejournal.com 2009-09-30 06:39 pm (UTC)(link)
Just thought - if you are interested, my friend Paul O'Brien (who I believe is a reviewer of some repute) writes an intermittent blog on comics (and other stuff, but mostly comics) - RSS'd at [livejournal.com profile] ifdestroyed.

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2009-10-01 10:41 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I know him from back in the V days, and that's one of two comics review blogs I consider worth following, alongside alternatecover.com