alexsarll: (seal)
[personal profile] alexsarll
Just as the Large Hadron Collider seems to have left us in the same lousy universe we were in on Tuesday, so its associated Torchwood episode was a bit of a disappointment. Part of the problem is that what counts as mad science for us should be positively passe on Earth-Who - "Large Hadron Colliders? Oh yeah, UNIT has two. At Torchwood we only have one, but it's better. Pink. Of course, the Doctor didn't need one at all, he trained Higg's bosons to come when he played the recorder." It's the same mismatch we got in Marvel's various foolhardy attempts to have the events of seven years ago be a big deal on their Earth, even though that New York gets its skyscrapers trashed pretty much weekly. But even beyond that, by having a plot in which turning on the LHC causes the return of the Old Ones, aren't you playing into the hands of the neo-luddites, crypto-mystics and twats? I appreciate that it's a standard Who plot, but could we not have had the other one, where aliens and their human catspaws are trying to prevent the switch-on in an effort to keep us weak? Not that I'd have minded so much were the story better, but really...those voice effects alone had me on the edge of giggles. Joe Lidster is usually so much better than this.
As for having Jack deliver the line "The dead don't come back"...well, no, apart from you, repeatedly. And half your team when you go messing about with gauntlets. And you being in love with someone who once boasted, quite correctly, that he brought back the dead on his first day in the job. You'd do better having Keith Richards warn against the evils of drugs.

There's been a lot of going back this week. I don't mean in the wider world - that seems Hellbent on beating a course back to the Dark Ages, to the extent that I can't be bothered to keep charting it on here, it depresses me to no end. I mean personally, whether it be the old gang back together at the wedding, or my plans for tonight when I'm off to the Verge (as was), scene of many a drunken night back in the Fan Club days, to see the New Royal Family, sober. Last Saturday I went to Stay Beautiful for the first time this year, an experience I half-expected to be valedictory, but which left me feeling much less out of place than I expected. And last night, even with Indelicates and David Devant shows on offer, I went to see the Blow Monkeys. Now in a sense, Devant or the Indelicates would have been more 'going back' - I've seen each I don't know how many times, and the Blow Monkeys never. Nor, in my decade or so of London gigging, have I previously been to the Jazz Cafe*. But the Blow Monkeys...I was introduced to them getting on for 15 years ago, just as my music tastes were starting to get beyond what the inkies and Select (RIP) were feeding me. Their infectious sense of calm and beauty, the genuine venom mixed in with an understanding that you can sometimes revolt better by transcendence than opposition - that wasn't very teenage, and in some ways it's still not very me, but it became quite formative nonetheless. I'd heard Dr Robert had moved on in something of the same wrong direction his contemporary Paul Weller did, and never expected a new Blow Monkeys album, or a chance to see them live. But then, that was before eternal recurrence came early and everyone started reforming.
Now, obviously I know that for the time being, time impacts on beings. But I've seen eighties acts before; Hell, I've seen seventies acts before. And most of them seemed to have jumped on to that celebrity track where ageing really does make people look cooler somehow, more lived-in and not just lived-out. Which is why it still came as a surprise when the chap in the audience I'd unconsciously pegged as 'the big lad who needs to stop trying to carry off the Dr Robert look these days' was, inevitably, Dr Robert. Dr Robert who was one of the reasons I initially got into the band because a few people had mentioned that I looked like him - and not putting myself or my younger self down here, but he looked like a much prettier me, which obviously had this narcissist hooked. Still charming, still sparkling, still with that voice and even that lisp - but not the young Apollo anymore.
And there weren't that many people there. First London date in 18 years, people know at least a couple of songs, not that big a venue - it should be fairly full, if not perhaps sold out. Not so. And predictably, some of that crowd are lig zombies who chatter through the new stuff - of which we get a lot but hey, I like most of the new album, I'm not complaining. What does puzzle me is the selection from the classics. Obviously they wouldn't get away without 'Digging Your Scene' or 'It Doesn't Have To Be This Way', and they don't try, or seem anything less than happy to be playing them again and comfortable with their past. But then we get songs that hit as duets, sung solo - 'Celebrate', 'Wait' and 'Slaves No More', the last of which I didn't even like much in the first place. Likewise 'Heaven Is A Place I'm Moving To' and 'Springtime for the World', songs I usually skip on CD. I wasn't honestly expecting 'Beautiful Child' in the current climate, or 'Cash' which I imagine would be a nightmare to play live, but wasn't 'This Is Your Life' a hit? Wasn't 'It Pays To Belong'?
I'm not saying I regret going, but I still feel like I missed something.

The support, incidentally, was Rhoda Dakar, ex of the Specials, accompanied by some bloke from Bad Manners on acoustic guitar. She played 'Racist Friend' from the old days, but not 'The Boiler'. Now, if you've never heard 'The Boiler'...it's getting on for 30 years old now and I'd say there's still nothing quite so harrowing ever to have been released in the disguise of a pop single. It wouldn't work in a cheery support slot for an upbeat band, it wouldn't work acoustic, and although she's aged incredibly well, one could hardly shout for it without the risk of being terribly misconstrued. But still, it seems weird to have seen Rhoda Dakar and not heard 'The Boiler'.

*Not what the name implies, is the short version. More a mid-size provincial venue, or the 12 Bar inexplicably rebuilt at double size. And £4.10 a pint? Get out.

Date: 2008-09-12 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] missfrost.livejournal.com
I really ought to go and see Rhoda Dakar one day, just for the obvious conversation. I remember there being quite a furore over The Boiler back in the day.
Totally agreed on the radio Torchwood. And the presence (and constant explanation) of the 'real' science jarred compared to the sort of pseudo science you'd normally expect.

Also Higgs'.
Edited Date: 2008-09-12 12:29 pm (UTC)

Date: 2008-09-13 09:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Drat. And I only read an interview with him a few weeks back, which if I could remember names would have sorted me.

The exposition was a bit heavy, but I like it when pseudoscience can nestle almost imperceptibly in the real stuff. Not least because if you do it well enough, you might even fool physics...

Date: 2008-09-12 07:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] invadergaz.livejournal.com
You mean, "hey kids, drugs are BAD. Or did you think I was BORN with this face?" ?

Date: 2008-09-13 09:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
He looks a damn sight cooler than most guys his age.

Date: 2008-09-14 10:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] augstone.livejournal.com
finally got a chance to listen to "the boiler". wow. harrowing is the word. can't believe it was a single.

Date: 2008-09-14 10:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
I know - even Duncan was alarmed.

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718192021 2223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 06:45 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios