![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Well, that was mildly better than I expected; the end, and the final revelation, might even have impressed me if it hadn't been so thoroughly spoilered in ever newsagent in the land. They even addressed the way it conflicted with Dalek morality pretty well. But that aside...pig-slaves? What was wrong with Robomen? Who engineers pig traits in to enhance loyalty as opposed to, say, dog traits? Was it just that we'd already seen the Slitheen make a pig creature so the effects team found that easier? And while I didn't mind the Brits doing American accents (even though Who has already done thirties Manhattan better, with the cast of Spaced no less), the Dalek voices seemed all wrong, and not in a 'weakened' or 'more individual' way, just a 'not really working' way.
I'm not looking forward to the sequel, except vaguely to hope that it will finally kill off the ruddy Daleks, because like the Doctor I am beginning to get annoyed by the cheapening of his sacrifices.
Memo to the Lowlander; while there's at least a certain honesty in the way your logo makes clear that your staff are rubbish, it's not very good advertising. And if you don't do cider, don't tell me that you could do shandy, as though that had any resemblance to what I requested. As it turns out, though, I do like strawberry beer, although I doubt I'd ever want more than one. Thank heavens for Sam Smith's.
I'm not looking forward to the sequel, except vaguely to hope that it will finally kill off the ruddy Daleks, because like the Doctor I am beginning to get annoyed by the cheapening of his sacrifices.
Memo to the Lowlander; while there's at least a certain honesty in the way your logo makes clear that your staff are rubbish, it's not very good advertising. And if you don't do cider, don't tell me that you could do shandy, as though that had any resemblance to what I requested. As it turns out, though, I do like strawberry beer, although I doubt I'd ever want more than one. Thank heavens for Sam Smith's.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 12:55 pm (UTC)Also YOU DRANK BEER! Hah!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 01:12 pm (UTC)Also, if they thought they knew how to make Low Countries chips, they were very wrong. The arses.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 02:41 pm (UTC)any chance you'd have a copy?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 03:00 pm (UTC)DAN - THIS CONTAINS A SPOILER
Date: 2007-04-22 04:20 pm (UTC)Re: DAN - THIS CONTAINS A SPOILER
Date: 2007-04-22 07:07 pm (UTC)I am not qualified to make any further comments on Doctor Who EVER.
Re: DAN - THIS CONTAINS A SPOILER
Date: 2007-04-22 07:09 pm (UTC)Re: DAN - THIS CONTAINS A SPOILER
Date: 2007-04-23 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 04:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 04:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 02:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 05:54 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 05:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 08:02 pm (UTC)I don't like raspberry-flavoured things, so a raspberry/beer hybrid is to me far more nightmarish than any human/Dalek could be.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 10:20 pm (UTC)Anyway, I didn't get it the way the hybridization worked out. OK, the idea seemed pretty neat - that pure strain species can end up weaker through lack of adaptability - but why sacrifice the battle armour? Why not absorb the human element within the shell? What you have is a bloke with a squid head who can get shot. Well done there.
OK, here's another thing. You could take this "genetic purity" thing that they were trying to overcome as a comment on the notion of ethnic purity, eg far right politics etc. Maybe, I have no idea if this was the writer's (writers') intention. It's kind of neat (even in the context of the baddies). But this is one thing that kind of grates for me in mainstream SF - when things get bumped up to the scale of other species (aliens) there seems to be little thought as to ethnic variation within that species (as would surely occur). So fair enough, the Daleks are supposed to be a genetic pure enemy - that's their shtick, but it gets a little brow-raising when every baddie species is "The So-and-So, they're all bad in x y and z criteria". Oh, rambling. I'll stop now.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 10:22 pm (UTC)I'll shut up now.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-24 06:11 pm (UTC)Your criticism of the logic of the hybridisation is fair - but since what we've seen thus far doesn't indicate any way in which it will actually increase their numbers, the stated Dalek goal, I'm hoping that we'll get an explanation next week, and ideally one which makes some degree of sense. Certainly we still seem to get some oldskool Dalek battle armour action, so they're not all switching to sharp tailoring as their outer casing.
The story which best addressed Dalek racism, and quite possibly the best Dalek story full stop, was Remembrance of the Daleks (http://www.drwhoguide.com/who_7h.htm), which juxtaposed them with human neo-Nazis.
I do know what you mean about aliens in general, but I think increasingly SF has come around to see the problems in that approach. Sure, a lot of the classic Who monsters are universally evil, but that's usually been explained in some manner - the Daleks are all genetically engineered, the Cybermen programmed, the Sontarans cloned. With races like the Ice Warriors, or the Earth Reptiles, we've seen differences in approach, different factions within the species, a more distinct characterisation as individuals rather than goons. Even with the Daleks, there were moments in 'Dalek' when the Doctor's hostility towards the last Dalek seemed (if only for a moment) uncomfortably close to racism.
Babylon 5 was also very good at setting up divisions within races, as well as between them - but I think even the accursed Star Trek eventually managed something with hardline vs moderate Klingons.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 06:33 pm (UTC)sam smiths don't sell you satan though eh!
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 07:05 pm (UTC)Also - grrrrrrr for the wholesale semi-fucking with historical figures. If we're going to have Tallulah Bankhead, lets fucking have her. I want cocaine, rapacious sexuality and hot girl-on-girl action[0].
And that writer seemed utterly unable to write decent dialogue for the Doctor.
[0]And these things forming part of Dr Who
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 08:03 pm (UTC)I take your point as regards villains' return, but while there are obviously a wealth of similarities between Who and superheroes, I think the differences are important too. One of those being that while the big superheroes are owned by gangster publishers, Who belongs to the BBC. I may not always agree with the decisions Who's stewards make, but they have all seemed to be people who genuinely care about the programme, whereas at Marvel or DC business imperatives will usually take precedence over creators who are ultimately seen as replaceable. As such, there's a freedom to permanently change the status quo in Who which there isn't with superheroes; I know Captain America is coming back sooner or later, but I'd be very surprised if Gallifrey ever returns.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-22 09:37 pm (UTC)Do you reckon that when the Face of Bo* said "You are not alone" it meant they're going to bring back The Master? (And I'm guessing they'll make him a her, too.)
*What happened to Luke and Daisy? Did Boss Hogg get them? Wouldn't that episode have been improved if the General Lee showed up and caused vehicular mayhem**?
**This is why I will never be allowed to write Dr Who.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-23 08:04 pm (UTC)You appear to be the last person in the country who hasn't had later developments of this series spoilered yet (even the eight year old girls on my Tube this morning were talking about it), so I'm hesitant to answer your question simply because I actually know the answer. Well, unless we've all been very well misdirected.