It'd be rude not to stare, really
Aug. 5th, 2005 12:38 pmThat's two Piccadilly trips I've taken now and I must admit, I was bloody glad there was a pint at the end of the first one. Electrogogo...it may simply be that I wasn't in the mood for it last night, but I don't think it's for me.
missfrost says it's not normally that crowded, but it had that typical Central London clubbing mix of a few cool people and genuinely astonishing costumes with haggard clubland survivors, try-hards and random backpackers. The music was a good synth-based mix (albeit perhaps a little one-note, and with a few too many remixes) and the first live act was promising - she looked like
suicideally, she was covering 'The Model' and she was accompanied by several poledancers, one with a unicorn's head. This, I realise with glee, is the sort of thing my mum pictures when I mention Soho. But then the Ping Pong B1tches come on...I saw them years ago, coming on like an even more desperate to shock Lolita Storm, and I was hoping against hope that they might have matured in the meantime. Instead, they've just stopped sounding like Digital H@rdc0re and started sounding like Republica out-takes.
Poptimism aside, I think it'll take a lot to get me clubbing in the centre again.
Ayman al-Zawahri and George Galloway seem to be taking very much the same line on who's to blame for July 7th, and the moral position of those prepared to kill while sticking up for extremist Islam. Does anybody still need further proof that Galloway is slime?
Meanwhile, as regards al-Zawahri, I think today's the best Sun headline since the Falklands.
Nearing the end of Psmith Journalist, I realise what's been unsettling me - this is a Wodehouse protagonist who genuinely cares about corruption and the condition of the poor, who wasn't just adopting it as the pose it seemed to be in Mike and Psmith, who isn't just doing it to impress a girl. And then the further realisation hits - he couldn't be doing it to impress a girl, because I don't think there's been a female speaking part in the whole novel.
Many of you will only know Bill Savage from my "dirty volgans" icon. Suffice to say that he was the star of Invasion, a strip which appeared in the first year of 2000AD (beginning before even Judge Dredd) and was a hero in the resistance when Britain was invaded by thinly-disguised Russians. The strip has recently been resurrected by 2000AD veteran Pat Mills, and some of what he's done has been excellent - he's explained why they're called Volgans, for starters, and generally painted quite an evocative picture of Britain under the neo-Stalinist jackboot. But in the new run, which began this week, he has seriously mis-stepped. To have a lairy trucker quote Leonard Cohen seemed a bit unlikely - but to reveal that the Volgans were allied with Britain's aristocracy? I know you hate the ruling classes, Pat, but that simply doesn't make sense.
Still, John Smith and Paul Marshall are back together for space censorship epic Leatherjack in the same issues, and that alone's enough to keep me reading.
Poptimism aside, I think it'll take a lot to get me clubbing in the centre again.
Ayman al-Zawahri and George Galloway seem to be taking very much the same line on who's to blame for July 7th, and the moral position of those prepared to kill while sticking up for extremist Islam. Does anybody still need further proof that Galloway is slime?
Meanwhile, as regards al-Zawahri, I think today's the best Sun headline since the Falklands.
Nearing the end of Psmith Journalist, I realise what's been unsettling me - this is a Wodehouse protagonist who genuinely cares about corruption and the condition of the poor, who wasn't just adopting it as the pose it seemed to be in Mike and Psmith, who isn't just doing it to impress a girl. And then the further realisation hits - he couldn't be doing it to impress a girl, because I don't think there's been a female speaking part in the whole novel.
Many of you will only know Bill Savage from my "dirty volgans" icon. Suffice to say that he was the star of Invasion, a strip which appeared in the first year of 2000AD (beginning before even Judge Dredd) and was a hero in the resistance when Britain was invaded by thinly-disguised Russians. The strip has recently been resurrected by 2000AD veteran Pat Mills, and some of what he's done has been excellent - he's explained why they're called Volgans, for starters, and generally painted quite an evocative picture of Britain under the neo-Stalinist jackboot. But in the new run, which began this week, he has seriously mis-stepped. To have a lairy trucker quote Leonard Cohen seemed a bit unlikely - but to reveal that the Volgans were allied with Britain's aristocracy? I know you hate the ruling classes, Pat, but that simply doesn't make sense.
Still, John Smith and Paul Marshall are back together for space censorship epic Leatherjack in the same issues, and that alone's enough to keep me reading.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:43 am (UTC)Galloway is slime. Some of my best buds in Scotland find him to be some sort of cult figure, but I say replace the l with an n and you're a lot closer.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:46 am (UTC)I've got friends who I think like him simply for being 'anti-establishment', or for his supposed rhetorical skills. It worries me a little, given he's clearly pro- some far worse establishments.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:45 am (UTC)I had a feeling that might be the case. I'm not a big remix fan.
Wow, I read a post of yours and it's not got a hundred million comments already! And I actually read it. Sort of.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:47 am (UTC)It's later than usual for my first post, what with the half day.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:18 pm (UTC)Christ, yesterday the canal was teeming with pedestrians and cyclists. Commuters are a bloody superstitious lot, aren't they?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:24 pm (UTC)I don't think there's been a female speaking part in the whole novel.
Date: 2005-08-05 11:50 am (UTC)Re: I don't think there's been a female speaking part in the whole novel.
Date: 2005-08-05 11:53 am (UTC)andy, you're a star
Date: 2005-08-05 11:57 am (UTC)Re: andy, you're a star
Date: 2005-08-05 11:59 am (UTC)Anyway, fictional characters are different. You can know so much more about them so much more easily than real people.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 11:59 am (UTC)this is the factor of electro at the moment which i really dont like. the whole shock to get noticed, stylisation and image over musical credibility thing. i dont wanna see people throwing themselves across the floor tearing their clothes off covered in fake (or real) blood when i see a band. id rather see a band who made genuinely great electro based on just being good. thats my main gripe with electro although my secondary gripe is being somewhat bored of twee electro bands with rather weak drums with little punch and generic female singers.
still, ive been tempted by electrogogo for a while in the quest for clubs i might like. im not sure if it will really be my thing though.
Nicky xxx
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:01 pm (UTC)But with that caveat, I suppose in general I'd agree. The Noblesse Obliges and PPBs of this world...it's all a bit gruesome, isn't it, and slightly embarrassing?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:05 pm (UTC)with fischerspooner, it felt like it was original on a mainstream level. yeah so the club kids were years ago but we hadnt really seen stuff like that before and the original is always better than the subsequent things. also as they seemily brought that kinda thing to the mass market they kinda did it better with higher quality music than any of the bands since. id be happy for there to really just be one of them rather than that be the only way electro gets anywhere. i get the feeling that the real reason electroclash died was because people jumped onto the image and style too much and ignored the music which actually had a lot of potential and instead got diluted into indie with the killers and the bravery
Nicky xxx
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:30 pm (UTC)Nicky xxx
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:17 pm (UTC)seriously though, i think i get what you mean. so many mediocre artists out there trying to shock. it bores me to tears.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:23 pm (UTC)i find it frustrating because ultimately every single time electro has been considered a joke, its because of fashion and because of performance art. people go on about 80s revival listening to certain bands more because of their haircuts and suits but equally people slag off electro for the very same reason. its association with embarrassing fasion statements makes the music and medium embarrassing by default where as guitar music and real drums has always been stamped with a label of cool. i think i just want to see an electro band come out who everyone can respect and who dont get dogged by really dodgy stylistics that people will laugh at in 5 years time!
Nicky xxx
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:17 pm (UTC)And what's the Sun's headline?
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:20 pm (UTC)And yes, that's the basics, but I like the whole alternate timeline Mills came up with where Vashkov's Volgan party took power, Labour got rid of the American bases over here and so forth.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:29 pm (UTC)Such anachronisms are one of the reasons I do like 'Another England. Another 2004' in Savage.
no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 01:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-08-05 06:10 pm (UTC)