No one in Germany finds vice amusing
Jan. 25th, 2005 02:29 pm"Newsnight presenters like to pretend they're different. But all they are is a bit more pompous."
Paxman speaks.
Newsnight referenced the Idler's 'Cr@p Towns' feature/book last week, which seemed like some sort of watershed moment. I wonder if they've used the word 'chav' yet?
They also had the head of the European Space Agency saying that Titan had most of the ingredients for life, but not oxygen, as though that were an insurmountable obstacle. Given we have stuff like the archaea here, that seems a little pessimistic. (I also note from that link that there is a level of biological classification back before 'kingdom' - 'domain'. I wish they'd taught us the truth in school science classes)
antonyjohnston informs me that there is currently a TV advertising campaign for KY jelly. The mind boggles. As do other things, I suppose.
I love the way that even a tabloid press given to pouncing on celebrity 'love rats' can't muster much outrage at Brad Pitt ditching Jennifer Aniston in favour of Angelina Jolie, because it was so obviously the right choice. Hmmm, a very symmetrical woman with photogenic hair, or one of the sexiest human beings on Earth?
[Poll #424601]
Paxman speaks.
Newsnight referenced the Idler's 'Cr@p Towns' feature/book last week, which seemed like some sort of watershed moment. I wonder if they've used the word 'chav' yet?
They also had the head of the European Space Agency saying that Titan had most of the ingredients for life, but not oxygen, as though that were an insurmountable obstacle. Given we have stuff like the archaea here, that seems a little pessimistic. (I also note from that link that there is a level of biological classification back before 'kingdom' - 'domain'. I wish they'd taught us the truth in school science classes)
I love the way that even a tabloid press given to pouncing on celebrity 'love rats' can't muster much outrage at Brad Pitt ditching Jennifer Aniston in favour of Angelina Jolie, because it was so obviously the right choice. Hmmm, a very symmetrical woman with photogenic hair, or one of the sexiest human beings on Earth?
[Poll #424601]
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:34 pm (UTC)xx
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:36 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
Date: 2005-01-25 02:40 pm (UTC)peter: no way buddy - i remember the last time i listened to a giant chicken.
(cue long scene with peter battling giant chicken)
peter: another time.
giant chicken: there won't BE another time. Y2K!!!
peter: what, are you trying to sell me chicken or sechs jelly?
the server IS STILL DOWN.
Re: this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
Date: 2005-01-25 02:43 pm (UTC)Re: this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
Date: 2005-01-25 03:02 pm (UTC)At work? My class was cancelled last night because they were down - has someone put a slice of toast and lego men in a disc slot?? [that was how my sisters broke the video circa 1988]
Re: this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
From:Re: this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
From:Re: this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
From:Re: this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
From:Re: this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
From:Re: this is what happends when you have no telly and only family guy dvds work...
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:44 pm (UTC)No, not really. She creeps me out.
Then again, so does Brad Pitt, to a certain part.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 02:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:12 pm (UTC)Why???
Also Brad Pitt=bland. No thanks. I am disapointed she could not find someone better.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:anyway, newsnight far more interesting than brad pitt...
Date: 2005-01-25 03:15 pm (UTC)dandodavies possibly...basically i think everyone who worked behind the camera on network 7 is now in charge...
Re: anyway, newsnight far more interesting than brad pitt...
Date: 2005-01-25 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:24 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:27 pm (UTC)i'm gonna go for aniston, if only to avoid the emotional headfvck that lies down the jolie path...
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:40 pm (UTC)i steadfastedly avoided having a teenage crush on brad pitt, but unfortunately films like interview with a vampire (i even like tom in that, god help me) and fight club have undone the good work in recent years.
no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 03:52 pm (UTC)Also, I may disagree with your taste re: Aniston, but I applaud the general principle.
(no subject)
From:A propos of nothing
Date: 2005-01-25 04:55 pm (UTC)Re: A propos of nothing
Date: 2005-01-25 04:59 pm (UTC)http://www.splitting-images.com/brad_pitt.html
Re: A propos of nothing
From:Re: A propos of nothing
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 06:56 pm (UTC)Angelina Jolie+Brad Pitt=a lovely mental image to make a dull day at work feel that little bit better. I can't be the only one that thinks that?
x
no subject
Date: 2005-01-26 05:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2005-01-25 11:39 pm (UTC)Seriously, Jolie = blee. Jolie Laide, that's what I call her!
no subject
Date: 2005-01-27 10:39 am (UTC)