alexsarll: (Default)
[personal profile] alexsarll
So justice was done in yesterday's poll. And, looking back, in the superhero film poll too, where X2 achieved a deserved but deservedly narrow victory. The lesson being that democracy does work, but only when the electorate is screened by some means. I hope that the 'reading Alex's blog qualification' can be imposed on the UK electorate in time for the next parliamentary elections.

Spent last night in the Place Of Bad Yet Wonderful Pizza and then the pub with [livejournal.com profile] dr_shatterhand and several of the Unblogged. The tragedy is that some of the latter have lives which would make for quality livejournal fodder. I mean, one of them has spent the last fortnight at work sitting next to Alan Rickman.

Something [livejournal.com profile] jamesward said yesterday set me thinking (yes, I know that's not normal). He posted about socks and chip&PIN cards, then complained when all the responses concerned the latter. It occurs to me that this is one of the things I most like about livejournal; one can broadcast on various topics, and people are then free to discuss whichever aspects appeal to them. One thus discovers shared interests where one might never have expected them, without ever having to specifically question anyone. Sometimes, the lack of responses on a given topic comes as no surprise (Baron Corvo, the science of martyrdom); other times it's more puzzling (Alan Hollinghurst, seedless grapes). Thinking back, I used to do this even before I was online; I'd drop occasional allusions to something obscure, because if anyone did pick up on them I'd know I'd found a kindred spirit. It's just so much easier this way.

Apparently a gang of black and Asian men have been beating up Jews in Stamford Hill while giving Nazi salutes. If the media want a story about people who have a disgraceful lack of understanding of Third Reich atrocities, why aren't they going with this one?

Date: 2005-01-20 11:14 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rentaghost31.livejournal.com
mmmmmmm Alan Rickman. So is he a good bloke to sit next to then?

Date: 2005-01-20 11:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Apparently he's exactly like he is onscreen, except with less killing people.

Date: 2005-01-20 11:17 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rentaghost31.livejournal.com
good to know. He wouldn't happen to be on the lookout for a thirtysomething blonde Irisher. would he?

Date: 2005-01-20 11:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
If he is then the matter didn't arise. See, if only the chap in question had his own LJ he could auction off a date with him or something!

Date: 2005-01-20 11:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rentaghost31.livejournal.com
bah. use your powers - this man needs an lj NOW!

Date: 2005-01-20 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pippaalice.livejournal.com
ruuuuuuuuhhhh. could i borrow him occasionally? ;)

Date: 2005-01-20 12:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
I suspect [livejournal.com profile] intermix may want a go too. We'll need some scheduling software...

Date: 2005-01-20 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rentaghost31.livejournal.com
no. we'll need an epos system.

Date: 2005-01-20 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rentaghost31.livejournal.com
no.
well, maybe. It'll depend what mood I'm in. You might catch me on a slightly less selfish day.

Date: 2005-01-20 01:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] perfectlyvague.livejournal.com
He has a lovely wife. I invited him to tea once but he was too busy but said that my invitation was 'charming' and then wrote me a letter about breathing and having fun. He has the handwriting of a graphic designer.

Date: 2005-01-20 02:24 pm (UTC)

Date: 2005-01-20 11:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] verlaine.livejournal.com
I'm a bit worried that portmanteau posts are the last refuge of a scoundrel. Obviously I make them all the time, but are they really any more convenient for the readership, or is it just a cynical ploy to salve the poster's ego by making sure every post harvests a large number of comments?

Date: 2005-01-20 11:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Are you calling me a comment-wh0re, sah?

Part of it is simply that making one post with four topics seems more...*weighty* than making four posts, each with one topic. One of my lurkers has compared my LJ to a newspaper column, and my favourites of those are often the weekly ones with a series of unrelated paragraphs. I feel happier providing something for everyone each time.

Date: 2005-01-20 11:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] verlaine.livejournal.com
An excellent justification, and one which I shall certainly use if challenged!

Date: 2005-01-20 11:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wardytron.livejournal.com
Islamophobia. Presumably the black and Asian men are Muslims and presumably the media are frightened of (a) being accused of Islamophobia and (b) Muslims. Plus if you're a Guardian leader writer, white Nazism is obviously wrong, but non-white Nazism is a reaction to Palestinian oppression/Western imperialism or something.

Are seedless grapes GM?

Date: 2005-01-20 11:43 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Well, any form of selective breeding is 'GM' but they've been around long enough that few people would use the term now. 'GM' = 'genetically modified [by new methods]'.

And yes, I fear you're likely right on the other point.

Date: 2005-01-20 12:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publicansdecoy.livejournal.com
>>Presumably the black and Asian men are Muslims

You islamophobe!

-x-

Date: 2005-01-20 12:47 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
For various small world reasons, the chap who sits next to me has been perusing some pictures of NYE. He genuinely didn't know whether you were a boy or a girl.

Also, Do Me Bad Things are playing Stay Beautiful on the 4th.

Date: 2005-01-20 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publicansdecoy.livejournal.com
Did I look especially girlish on NYE? or were my manboobs showing?

Oh, they are? Well, that's a shame.

-x-

Date: 2005-01-20 02:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
He was just going by your face and your silken raven tresses.

Date: 2005-01-20 02:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] publicansdecoy.livejournal.com
Jodders did my makeup that night. Good old Jods. Does he fancy me then, your mate?

-x-

Date: 2005-01-20 02:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Sadly not.

Date: 2005-01-20 12:58 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wardytron.livejournal.com
It's a fair cop, Guvnor. There was a poll in the Guardian late last year that found that 58% of British Muslims want a law banning anyone from insulting or criticising Islam. I am phobic about, and hostile to, any belief system that thinks criticism of itself should be illegal. Of course, these lads in Stamford Hill might not be Muslims, but 10p says they are.

Date: 2005-01-20 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
At present only three other people, none of whom I know, have Islamophobia listed as an interest. Do feel free to join me!

Date: 2005-01-20 01:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wardytron.livejournal.com
Oh, why the hell not? It can be this year's big craze.

Date: 2005-01-20 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atommickbrane.livejournal.com
Bah it's not as good as this interest which somewhat bafflingly was pointed out to me a while back.

Date: 2005-01-20 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
As soon as bigots start campaigning against your livejournal, I'll be sure to add that as an interest too.

Date: 2005-01-20 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atommickbrane.livejournal.com
I'm surprised I've got away with it for so long really.

Date: 2005-01-20 02:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stu-n.livejournal.com
Nah, they aren''t GM, apart from in the selective breeding sense. You make a new vine by grafting cuttings onto normal vine rootstock.

Date: 2005-01-21 11:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkmarcpi.livejournal.com
Also, racist attacks of any kind may be more of a concern than Prince Harry's fancy dress shenanigans, but front-page headlines on anything to do with the Royal Family helps sell lots of newspapers (and help self-justify/perpetuate the tabloid media and its obsession with celebrity, fame etc), whereas anti-semitic assaults don’t.

Date: 2005-01-20 01:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamesward.livejournal.com
I wasn't exactly complaining that everyone posted about Chip & Pin, I was just wondering whether or not the reason everyone posted about it is because that was the title of the original post. In the follow-up post, entitled "SOCKS" everyone mentioned socks, no-one mentioned the title theory (and thus added weight to the theory). I was tempted to do another post entitled "TITLE" but couldn't be @rsed.

Date: 2005-01-20 01:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
You did call everyone "mindless fvcking sheep" or something, didn't you? In my book that constitutes a complaint.

Date: 2005-01-20 01:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] jamesward.livejournal.com
I meant it as a term of affection.

Date: 2005-01-20 01:54 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autravail.livejournal.com
But not necessarily a complaint about them talking about Chip & Pin...

Date: 2005-01-20 01:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Did anyone say it was?

Anyway, guessing by the people you've added, I suspect I know you. So who are you?

Date: 2005-01-20 02:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] autravail.livejournal.com
That would be telling. (Which I think someone is about to do...)

Date: 2005-01-20 03:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] martylog.livejournal.com
the science of martyrdom

Is this something to do with me?

Date: 2005-01-20 03:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Badoom-*tish*!

No, this one: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4167565.stm

Date: 2005-01-20 05:35 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thermaland.livejournal.com
Apparently a gang of black and Asian men have been beating up Jews in Stamford Hill while giving Nazi salutes. If the media want a story about people who have a disgraceful lack of understanding of Third Reich atrocities, why aren't they going with this one?

Because this story doesn't ring true at all.. Black men who do nazi salutes? Hello? Reminds me of this. I would say they are ordinary muggers - and so of course not Muslims .

Date: 2005-01-20 05:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Just because it was untrue the once, doesn't mean all similar incidents will be untrue. Are you unaware that one of Mugabe's bully boys (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/africa/699951.stm) adopted the nom-de-guerre Hitler?

Date: 2005-01-20 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thermaland.livejournal.com
London isn't Zimbabwe.

Date: 2005-01-20 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com
Hackney isn't far off. And no country has a monopoly on morons.

December 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
1718192021 2223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 11th, 2026 06:58 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios