alexsarll: (gunship)
Alex ([personal profile] alexsarll) wrote2008-10-28 06:58 pm

I try to resist posting about acts of inexcusable stupidity and venality these days, BUT...

Because he has nothing better to do - it's not as if we're in an economic crisis and the pound is at an historic low against the Euro or anything, after all - our Beloved Leader has joined in the chorus of moralising hysteria directed at Jonathan Ross and Russell Brand. Because politicians love to knock the BBC for being so terribly mean to them, and all the rest of the media loves to knock the BBC because it's better than them, and worst of all the BBC loves to knock the BBC because like everything else that is good and noble in our culture, it is currently beset with a crippling overdose of self-doubt and consequent belief in the virtue of self-flagellation. And so one of the few institutions of which Britain can still be rightly proud takes another hit as the jackals circle. I mean, have any of these shrill nonentities actually read the damn transcript? (NB: many purported transcripts available are woefully incomplete. The Times, for instance, with all the fidelity to truth one expects from a Murdoch rag, omits the 'Satanic Slvts' (NSFW, obviously) line - either because they were too stupid to understand it, or because it would militate against the impression of slurred innocence they're trying to summon re: Sachs' granddaughter. Not that I have the slightest thing against burlesque performers, you understand - but treating a suggestion that one such might have done the sex with a man in a manner befitting similar suggestions levelled regarding a small child or Victorian princess does seem rather bizarre).

Consider:

- Andrew Sachs cancelled on them. He was not a random victim. It is acceptable to leave voicemail for someone who belatedly cancelled on you in a tone which might be considered poor form on other voicemails.

- Andrew Sachs is only famous because he was happy to play the whipping boy in Fawlty Towers; he can hardly start standing on dignity now. Cf Stephen Fry on fame, specifically the differences between his own and Nicholas Lyndhurst's.

- And this one is the clincher: IT WAS FUNNY. Even without the voices of Ross and Brand, reading a bad transcript that's supplied for purposes of damning them rather than making me laugh, even overwhelmed with anger at the absurd storm around it all, I was cracking up. They made a comedy show; they engaged in nothing more dangerous than the use of harsh language (and even that was not as harsh as the coverage would have you think); they made people laugh. They offended some other people, for sure, but as we should all know by now, offended people are the very worst people on the planet.

As far as I'm concerned, Ross and Brand are both due a pat on the back if not a raise, and everyone who has objected can piss off to somewhere with a suitably deferential press for their tender sensibilities - Saudi, say, North Korea, or Iran.

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2008-10-30 06:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I've never heard the relevant audio, but knowing that Sachs did a turn as the single worst companion in the history of Who does not do wonders for my estimate of the man, even if it was in a story which was written by Magrs and thus presumably fairly amusing.

[identity profile] verlaine.livejournal.com 2008-10-30 06:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah, it's good fun. I dunno, all silliness aside, few would call me a hugely old-fashioned person, but taunting an old man over having fucked his granddaughter is beyond the line I consider decent behaviour. It's Aristophanes' Wasps all over again!

[identity profile] barrysarll.livejournal.com 2008-10-30 06:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't think they were taunting him per se; they were ringing him up in the manner of naughty schoolboys, because he had after all stood them up when he was meant to be doing the radio show. And what they said was naughty, but really pretty mild. Especially when you consider what she appears to have been up to with one of Max Mosley's chums (http://www.popbitch.com/tshirts/) (totally NSFW). If they'd started describing that film, I would feel they'd gone too far - but I'd still consider these resignations and hysterics grossly excessive.